PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHOC vs. DTCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHOC vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHOC achieves a 46.90% return, which is significantly higher than DTCR's 30.53% return.


SHOC

1D
0.16%
1M
-7.69%
6M
32.26%
YTD
46.90%
1Y
85.23%
3Y*
40.54%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
44.63%

DTCR

1D
-0.90%
1M
-3.58%
6M
12.55%
YTD
30.53%
1Y
47.91%
3Y*
27.27%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.41M$38.68M$44.72M
$1.25M$1.87M$2.57M

SHOC vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SHOC
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
46.90%49.91%16.74%61.97%-1.79%
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
30.53%28.99%14.92%18.93%1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SHOC and DTCR is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2022

0.66

The correlation between SHOC and DTCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHOC vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SHOC
SHOC Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SHOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHOC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SHOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHOC Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

DTCR
DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SHOC vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHOCDTCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

2.55

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.55

8.11

+5.44

SHOC vs. DTCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHOC Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the DTCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHOC and DTCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHOC vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHOC drawdown since its inception was -37.54%, roughly equal to the maximum DTCR drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHOC and DTCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHOCDTCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.54%

-38.98%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.20%

-17.88%

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.54%

-24.96%

-12.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.15%

-15.15%

-4.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.59%

-12.26%

+4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.11%

5.62%

+0.49%

Volatility

SHOC vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison

Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) has a higher volatility of 16.48% compared to Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) at 8.80%. This indicates that SHOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHOCDTCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.48%

8.80%

+7.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.09%

19.77%

+14.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.12%

24.75%

+15.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.87%

22.50%

+14.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.87%

22.25%

+14.62%

SHOC vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHOC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DTCR's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHOC vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison

SHOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than DTCR's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.90%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%
SHOC
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
0.14%0.23%0.35%0.65%0.24%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHOC and DTCR have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHOC has higher volatility (16.48%) compared to DTCR (8.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHOC dropped -37.54% vs DTCR's -38.98%.

On 3-year performance, SHOC leads with 40.54% vs 27.27% for DTCR. On fees, SHOC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DTCR has been the lower-risk option at 8.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SHOC has performed better with a 40.54% return vs 27.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHOC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DTCR.

DTCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.14% for SHOC.

SHOC is categorized as Semiconductors, while DTCR is REIT. SHOC tracks Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index, while DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SHOC and 0.50% for DTCR.

SHOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHOC and DTCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer