PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHMDX vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHMDX vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt (SHMDX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHMDX achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 7.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SHMDX has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 4.32%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 67.94% annualized return.


SHMDX

1D
-0.25%
1M
1.84%
YTD
4.39%
6M
4.65%
1Y
15.28%
3Y*
12.87%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
4.32%

NVDA

1D
-4.13%
1M
-6.99%
YTD
7.39%
6M
5.85%
1Y
38.94%
3Y*
68.08%
5Y*
59.90%
10Y*
67.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHMDX vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHMDX
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt
4.39%15.13%8.90%14.81%-19.74%-2.52%7.06%15.20%-7.86%11.58%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
7.39%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SHMDX and NVDA is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHMDX vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHMDX
SHMDX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SHMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SHMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHMDX vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt (SHMDX) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHMDXNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.20

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

1.94

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.82

4.51

+11.31

SHMDX vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHMDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.31, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHMDX and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHMDX vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHMDX drawdown since its inception was -35.83%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHMDX and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHMDXNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.83%

-89.72%

+53.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.33%

-20.21%

+15.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.23%

-36.88%

+30.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.98%

-66.34%

+34.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.98%

-66.34%

+34.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-15.04%

+14.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

-36.16%

+30.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

8.66%

-7.68%

Volatility

SHMDX vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt (SHMDX) is 1.27%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that SHMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHMDXNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

13.29%

-12.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.94%

26.92%

-22.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70%

35.50%

-30.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.95%

51.84%

-44.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.60%

49.87%

-42.27%

Dividends

SHMDX vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

SHMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
SHMDX
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt
6.20%6.21%6.73%8.10%10.70%4.78%5.24%5.51%6.80%6.12%6.72%6.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHMDX and NVDA have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to SHMDX (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHMDX dropped -35.83% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

SHMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHMDX and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer