SHMDX vs. DBLLX
SHMDX (Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt) and DBLLX (DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, SHMDX returned 4.32%/yr vs 3.49%/yr for DBLLX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SHMDX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for DBLLX.
Performance
SHMDX vs. DBLLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHMDX achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly higher than DBLLX's 1.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SHMDX has outperformed DBLLX with an annualized return of 4.32%, while DBLLX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.49% annualized return.
SHMDX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 4.39%
- 6M
- 4.65%
- 1Y
- 15.28%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
DBLLX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 4.95%
- 3Y*
- 6.90%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- 3.49%
SHMDX vs. DBLLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHMDX Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt | 4.39% | 15.13% | 8.90% | 14.81% | -19.74% | -2.52% | 7.06% | 15.20% | -7.86% | 11.58% |
DBLLX DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund | 1.21% | 7.86% | 7.20% | 7.00% | -5.05% | -0.21% | 3.53% | 8.57% | -0.04% | 4.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHMDX and DBLLX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2014 | 0.53 |
The correlation between SHMDX and DBLLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHMDX vs. DBLLX — Risk / Return Rank
SHMDX
DBLLX
SHMDX vs. DBLLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt (SHMDX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHMDX | DBLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 2.38 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 5.38 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.82 | 24.43 | -8.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHMDX vs. DBLLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHMDX drawdown since its inception was -35.83%, which is greater than DBLLX's maximum drawdown of -10.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHMDX and DBLLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHMDX | DBLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.83% | -10.13% | -25.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.33% | -0.92% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.23% | -1.35% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.98% | -10.13% | -21.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.98% | -10.13% | -21.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.10% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -1.29% | -4.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 0.20% | +0.78% |
Volatility
SHMDX vs. DBLLX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt (SHMDX) has a higher volatility of 1.27% compared to DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) at 0.35%. This indicates that SHMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHMDX | DBLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 0.35% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.94% | 0.93% | +3.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.70% | 1.16% | +3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.95% | 1.94% | +5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.60% | 1.90% | +5.70% |
SHMDX vs. DBLLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHMDX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLLX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHMDX vs. DBLLX - Dividend Comparison
SHMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, more than DBLLX's 5.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLLX DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund | 5.08% | 5.27% | 4.70% | 3.74% | 2.41% | 2.15% | 2.61% | 4.93% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 3.19% | 3.77% |
SHMDX Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Mkts Debt | 6.20% | 6.21% | 6.73% | 8.10% | 10.70% | 4.78% | 5.24% | 5.51% | 6.80% | 6.12% | 6.72% | 6.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHMDX and DBLLX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHMDX has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to DBLLX (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHMDX dropped -35.83% vs DBLLX's -10.13%.
DBLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.30 vs 3.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHMDX and DBLLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer