SHLG.L vs. XLKQ.L
SHLG.L (iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - SHLG.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while XLKQ.L tracks the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SHLG.L returned 11.16%/yr vs 26.60%/yr for XLKQ.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SHLG.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.
Performance
SHLG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SHLG.L is traded in GBP, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHLG.L achieves a 19.45% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 23.81% return.
SHLG.L
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- 11.41%
- YTD
- 19.45%
- 6M
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 25.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.16%
- 10Y*
- —
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- 14.41%
- YTD
- 23.81%
- 6M
- 22.31%
- 1Y
- 54.52%
- 3Y*
- 33.18%
- 5Y*
- 26.60%
- 10Y*
- 27.22%
SHLG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHLG.L iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 19.45% | 3.87% | 18.54% | 26.67% | -20.62% | 20.85% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 23.81% | 15.76% | 44.03% | 51.84% | -20.58% | 38.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHLG.L and XLKQ.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SHLG.L and XLKQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
SHLG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SHLG.L
XLKQ.L
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SHLG.L
XLKQ.L
Industrials
SHLG.L
XLKQ.L
Real Estate
SHLG.L
XLKQ.L
-
Basic Materials
SHLG.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Communication Services
SHLG.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SHLG.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SHLG.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Energy
SHLG.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Financial Services
SHLG.L
-
XLKQ.L
Healthcare
SHLG.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Utilities
SHLG.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHLG.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
SHLG.L
XLKQ.L
SHLG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SHLG.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHLG.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.46 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 3.24 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.80 | 8.42 | -3.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHLG.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 2.83 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 1.21 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 1.33 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
SHLG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHLG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, smaller than the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -28.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHLG.L and XLKQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHLG.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.07% | -28.74% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.65% | -16.76% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.02% | -28.74% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | -28.74% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -2.84% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.50% | -5.04% | -4.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.43% | 6.45% | -1.02% |
Volatility
SHLG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SHLG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) at 6.83%. This indicates that SHLG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHLG.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.69% | 6.83% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.08% | 14.29% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.11% | 19.18% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 22.04% | -3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 21.65% | -2.78% |
SHLG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHLG.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHLG.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison
SHLG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHLG.L iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.33% | 0.39% | 0.47% | 0.43% | 0.62% | 0.66% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHLG.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SHLG.L.
SHLG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SHLG.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.
Find the right allocation for SHLG.L and XLKQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer