PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHLG.L vs. CSP1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHLG.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SHLG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SHLG.L is traded in GBP, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHLG.L achieves a 19.45% return, which is significantly higher than CSP1.L's 10.55% return.


SHLG.L

1D
-2.36%
1M
11.41%
YTD
19.45%
6M
19.72%
1Y
25.67%
3Y*
18.72%
5Y*
11.16%
10Y*

CSP1.L

1D
0.05%
1M
4.54%
YTD
10.55%
6M
9.89%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHLG.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SHLG.L
iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
19.45%3.87%18.54%26.67%-20.62%20.85%
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.55%9.37%27.35%19.79%-9.05%30.86%

Correlation

The correlation between SHLG.L and CSP1.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021

0.75

The correlation between SHLG.L and CSP1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SHLG.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SHLG.L
CSP1.L

Technology

84.2%
38.0%

Industrials

11.3%
7.9%

Real Estate

4.6%
1.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Energy

-

3.4%

Financial Services

-

11.3%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Technology

SHLG.L
84.2%
CSP1.L
38.0%

Industrials

SHLG.L
11.3%
CSP1.L
7.9%

Real Estate

SHLG.L
4.6%
CSP1.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

SHLG.L

-

CSP1.L
1.7%

Communication Services

SHLG.L

-

CSP1.L
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SHLG.L

-

CSP1.L
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

SHLG.L

-

CSP1.L
4.7%

Energy

SHLG.L

-

CSP1.L
3.4%

Financial Services

SHLG.L

-

CSP1.L
11.3%

Healthcare

SHLG.L

-

CSP1.L
8.4%

Utilities

SHLG.L

-

CSP1.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHLG.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHLG.L
SHLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SHLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHLG.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SHLG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHLG.LCSP1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.51

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

4.07

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.80

14.99

-10.19

SHLG.L vs. CSP1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHLG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHLG.L and CSP1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHLG.LCSP1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

2.73

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

1.04

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.09

-0.48

Drawdowns

SHLG.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHLG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, which is greater than CSP1.L's maximum drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHLG.L and CSP1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHLG.LCSP1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.07%

-25.48%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

-7.12%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.02%

-20.77%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-20.77%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-0.24%

-2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.50%

-3.32%

-6.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.43%

1.94%

+3.49%

Volatility

SHLG.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SHLG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that SHLG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHLG.LCSP1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.69%

2.62%

+5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

7.16%

+7.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.11%

10.62%

+8.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.97%

14.31%

+4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

15.57%

+3.30%

SHLG.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHLG.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHLG.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison

SHLG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while CSP1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHLG.L
iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.33%0.39%0.47%0.43%0.62%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHLG.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SHLG.L.

SHLG.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. SHLG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SHLG.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHLG.L and CSP1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer