SHLD vs. WDGF
SHLD (Global X Defense Tech ETF) and WDGF (WisdomTree Global Defense Fund) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - SHLD tracks the Global X Defense Tech Index while WDGF tracks the WisdomTree Global Defense Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SHLD charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WDGF.
Performance
SHLD vs. WDGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHLD achieves a -10.17% return, which is significantly lower than WDGF's -3.15% return.
SHLD
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -11.99%
- YTD
- -10.17%
- 6M
- -12.31%
- 1Y
- -0.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDGF
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- -3.15%
- 6M
- -4.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHLD vs. WDGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | -10.17% | -0.48% |
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | -3.15% | -0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHLD and WDGF is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHLD vs. WDGF — Risk / Return Rank
SHLD
WDGF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SHLD vs. WDGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) and WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHLD | WDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.03 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHLD vs. WDGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHLD drawdown since its inception was -25.40%, which is greater than WDGF's maximum drawdown of -18.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHLD and WDGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHLD | WDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.40% | -18.00% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.40% | -18.00% | -7.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -6.02% | +2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.97% | — | — |
Volatility
SHLD vs. WDGF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHLD | WDGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.85% | 22.72% | +2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 22.72% | -1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 22.72% | -1.33% |
SHLD vs. WDGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHLD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WDGF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHLD vs. WDGF - Dividend Comparison
SHLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than WDGF's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | 0.61% | 0.55% | 0.53% | 0.26% |
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SHLD and WDGF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WDGF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDGF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHLD.
SHLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.05% for WDGF.
SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index, while WDGF tracks WisdomTree Global Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SHLD and 0.45% for WDGF.
Find the right allocation for SHLD and WDGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer