PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHLD vs. QQHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHLD vs. QQHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHLD achieves a -2.28% return, which is significantly lower than QQHG's 11.43% return.


SHLD

1D
-2.39%
1M
-7.01%
YTD
-2.28%
6M
1.71%
1Y
9.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQHG

1D
-0.26%
1M
4.73%
YTD
11.43%
6M
10.75%
1Y
26.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHLD vs. QQHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-2.28%22.86%
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
11.43%20.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SHLD and QQHG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHLD vs. QQHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

QQHG
QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHLD vs. QQHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHLDQQHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.41

2.82

-2.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.74

3.92

-3.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.51

-0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

4.30

-3.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.30

17.07

-15.78

SHLD vs. QQHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the QQHG Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHLD and QQHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHLDQQHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

2.82

-2.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.00

3.35

-1.35

Drawdowns

SHLD vs. QQHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHLD drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, which is greater than QQHG's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHLD and QQHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHLDQQHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.10%

-6.18%

-13.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.10%

-6.18%

-13.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.85%

-0.26%

-18.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-0.97%

-2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.51%

1.55%

+5.96%

Volatility

SHLD vs. QQHG - Volatility Comparison

Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) at 2.12%. This indicates that SHLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHLDQQHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.81%

2.12%

+5.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.35%

6.66%

+12.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.05%

9.47%

+14.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.13%

9.53%

+11.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.13%

9.53%

+11.60%

SHLD vs. QQHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHLD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQHG's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHLD vs. QQHG - Dividend Comparison

SHLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than QQHG's 0.20% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
0.20%0.17%0.00%0.00%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.56%0.55%0.53%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHLD and QQHG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to QQHG (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHLD dropped -20.10% vs QQHG's -6.18%.

On 1-year performance, QQHG leads with 26.43% vs 9.71% for SHLD. On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, QQHG has been the lower-risk option at 2.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQHG has performed better with a 26.43% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHLD.

SHLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.20% for QQHG.

SHLD is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while QQHG is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SHLD and 0.45% for QQHG.

QQHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHLD and QQHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer