PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHLD vs. HWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHLD vs. HWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHLD achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than HWM's 29.23% return.


SHLD

1D
-2.04%
1M
2.37%
YTD
-1.50%
6M
-1.03%
1Y
8.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HWM

1D
0.03%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
29.23%
6M
33.60%
1Y
54.95%
3Y*
79.69%
5Y*
50.00%
10Y*
33.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHLD vs. HWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-1.50%74.16%35.03%12.89%
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
29.23%87.95%102.71%13.53%

Correlation

The correlation between SHLD and HWM is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHLD vs. HWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

HWM
HWM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHLD vs. HWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHLDHWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.30

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

3.46

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.28

9.77

-8.49

SHLD vs. HWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the HWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHLD and HWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHLD vs. HWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHLD drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, smaller than the maximum HWM drawdown of -88.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHLD and HWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHLDHWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.10%

-88.30%

+68.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.10%

-15.89%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.20%

-3.26%

-14.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.34%

-31.00%

+27.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.12%

5.61%

+2.51%

Volatility

SHLD vs. HWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) is 9.05%, while Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that SHLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHLDHWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.05%

11.03%

-1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.94%

25.03%

-5.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.55%

31.46%

-6.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.29%

32.20%

-10.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.29%

39.82%

-18.53%

Dividends

SHLD vs. HWM - Dividend Comparison

SHLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than HWM's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
0.18%0.21%0.24%0.31%0.25%0.13%0.05%0.39%1.42%0.88%40.49%1.22%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.56%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHLD and HWM have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HWM has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to SHLD (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHLD dropped -20.10% vs HWM's -88.30%.

HWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHLD and HWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer