SHLD vs. DXYZ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SHLD (Global X Defense Tech ETF) is Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Global X Defense Tech Index, while DXYZ (Destiny Tech100 Inc) is a stock. Over the past year, SHLD returned 10.40% vs -28.04% for DXYZ. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SHLD vs. DXYZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) and Destiny Tech100 Inc (DXYZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHLD achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly higher than DXYZ's -5.42% return.

SHLD

• 1D: -2.04%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: -1.50%
• 6M: -1.03%
• 1Y: 10.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DXYZ

• 1D: -25.14%
• 1M: -44.50%
• YTD: -5.42%
• 6M: -23.68%
• 1Y: -28.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHLD vs. DXYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF	-1.50%	74.16%	14.16%
DXYZ Destiny Tech100 Inc	-5.42%	-47.96%	613.45%

Correlation

The correlation between SHLD and DXYZ is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2024	0.25

Return for Risk

SHLD vs. DXYZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHLD

SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 16
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 16
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 16

DXYZ

DXYZ Risk / Return Rank: 32
DXYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
DXYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
DXYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 38
DXYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
DXYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHLD vs. DXYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) and Destiny Tech100 Inc (DXYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHLD	DXYZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	-0.28	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	0.27	+0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.03	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	-0.47	+0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.28	-0.93	+2.22

SHLD vs. DXYZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is higher than the DXYZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHLD and DXYZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SHLD vs. DXYZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHLD drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, smaller than the maximum DXYZ drawdown of -90.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHLD and DXYZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHLD	DXYZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.10%	-90.35%	+70.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.10%	-59.33%	+39.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.20%	-70.97%	+52.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.34%	-68.37%	+65.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.12%	30.12%	-22.00%

Volatility

SHLD vs. DXYZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) is 9.05%, while Destiny Tech100 Inc (DXYZ) has a volatility of 52.18%. This indicates that SHLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXYZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHLD	DXYZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.05%	52.18%	-43.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.94%	85.74%	-65.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.55%	101.63%	-77.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.29%	165.45%	-144.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.29%	165.45%	-144.16%

Dividends

SHLD vs. DXYZ - Dividend Comparison

SHLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while DXYZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DXYZ Destiny Tech100 Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF	0.56%	0.55%	0.53%	0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHLD and DXYZ in my portfolio?

SHLD and DXYZ have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHLD or DXYZ?

DXYZ has higher volatility (52.18%) compared to SHLD (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHLD dropped -20.10% vs DXYZ's -90.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.