PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHLD.L vs. XLKQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHLD.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist (SHLD.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SHLD.L is traded in USD, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SHLD.L having a 17.77% return and XLKQ.L slightly higher at 17.97%.


SHLD.L

1D
0.11%
1M
3.71%
6M
17.56%
YTD
17.77%
1Y
25.07%
3Y*
19.63%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*

XLKQ.L

1D
-0.46%
1M
-2.56%
6M
20.54%
YTD
17.97%
1Y
32.89%
3Y*
31.49%
5Y*
22.29%
10Y*
25.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHLD.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SHLD.L
iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist
17.77%11.51%16.55%33.91%-29.11%16.50%27.22%28.27%-1.78%
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
17.97%24.49%41.63%59.85%-29.07%35.05%42.15%50.17%-8.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SHLD.L and XLKQ.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2018

0.75

The correlation between SHLD.L and XLKQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHLD.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHLD.L
SHLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SHLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

XLKQ.L
XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHLD.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist (SHLD.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHLD.LXLKQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

1.95

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.84

5.35

-0.51

SHLD.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHLD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHLD.L and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHLD.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHLD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, smaller than the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -39.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHLD.L and XLKQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHLD.LXLKQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.07%

-39.80%

+3.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-16.81%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.72%

-26.96%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.07%

-35.00%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.38%

-7.48%

+3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.27%

-9.18%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.27%

6.13%

-0.86%

Volatility

SHLD.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist (SHLD.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) have volatilities of 7.42% and 7.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHLD.LXLKQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.42%

7.47%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.10%

17.08%

+1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.64%

21.52%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.39%

27.46%

-6.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.23%

23.97%

-2.74%

SHLD.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHLD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHLD.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

SHLD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
SHLD.L
iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.35%0.39%0.48%0.43%0.63%0.66%0.84%1.00%
XLKQ.L
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHLD.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SHLD.L.

SHLD.L tracks iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SHLD.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHLD.L and XLKQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer