SHLD.L vs. FOGB.L
SHLD.L (iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist) and FOGB.L (Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD) are both Technology Equities funds - SHLD.L tracks the iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist while FOGB.L tracks the Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SHLD.L returned 9.32%/yr vs -8.94%/yr for FOGB.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SHLD.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FOGB.L.
Performance
SHLD.L vs. FOGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SHLD.L is traded in USD, while FOGB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FOGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHLD.L achieves a 17.77% return, which is significantly higher than FOGB.L's 4.43% return.
SHLD.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 17.56%
- YTD
- 17.77%
- 1Y
- 25.07%
- 3Y*
- 19.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- —
FOGB.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 1Y
- -3.10%
- 3Y*
- -3.83%
- 5Y*
- -8.94%
- 10Y*
- —
SHLD.L vs. FOGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHLD.L iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist | 17.77% | 11.51% | 16.55% | 33.91% | -29.11% | 16.50% | 13.21% |
FOGB.L Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD | 4.43% | -2.66% | -7.29% | -2.07% | -26.99% | 1.63% | 12.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHLD.L and FOGB.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SHLD.L and FOGB.L has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHLD.L vs. FOGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
SHLD.L
FOGB.L
SHLD.L vs. FOGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist (SHLD.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHLD.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.99 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | -0.12 | +2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | -0.21 | +5.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHLD.L vs. FOGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHLD.L drawdown since its inception was -36.07%, smaller than the maximum FOGB.L drawdown of -47.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHLD.L and FOGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHLD.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.07% | -47.61% | +11.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.40% | -15.90% | +4.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.72% | -23.99% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.07% | -47.61% | +11.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.38% | -40.01% | +35.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.27% | -28.74% | +19.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.27% | 8.83% | -3.56% |
Volatility
SHLD.L vs. FOGB.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist (SHLD.L) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L) at 3.95%. This indicates that SHLD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHLD.L | FOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 3.95% | +3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.10% | 11.30% | +6.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.64% | 15.97% | +5.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 18.14% | +3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 17.70% | +3.53% |
SHLD.L vs. FOGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHLD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FOGB.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHLD.L vs. FOGB.L - Dividend Comparison
SHLD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while FOGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOGB.L Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHLD.L iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist | 0.35% | 0.39% | 0.48% | 0.43% | 0.63% | 0.66% | 0.84% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHLD.L and FOGB.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SHLD.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SHLD.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FOGB.L.
SHLD.L tracks iShares Digital Security UCITS ETF USD Dist, while FOGB.L tracks Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Rize ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SHLD.L and 0.45% for FOGB.L.
Find the right allocation for SHLD.L and FOGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer