SHAPX vs. LCLAX
Compare and contrast key facts about ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX) and ClearBridge Select Fund Class A (LCLAX).
SHAPX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Mar 10, 1970. LCLAX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Sep 23, 2013.
Performance
SHAPX vs. LCLAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SHAPX vs. LCLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHAPX ClearBridge Appreciation Fund | -6.24% | 14.32% | 22.37% | 19.50% | -12.56% | 23.52% | 14.53% | 29.84% | -2.19% | 18.31% |
LCLAX ClearBridge Select Fund Class A | -10.74% | 6.87% | 21.13% | 23.82% | -33.28% | 19.86% | 58.29% | 33.03% | 10.18% | 38.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHAPX achieves a -6.24% return, which is significantly higher than LCLAX's -10.74% return. Over the past 10 years, SHAPX has underperformed LCLAX with an annualized return of 11.99%, while LCLAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.27% annualized return.
SHAPX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- -6.24%
- 6M
- -5.30%
- 1Y
- 10.69%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
LCLAX
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -8.34%
- YTD
- -10.74%
- 6M
- -12.89%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 9.74%
- 5Y*
- 1.57%
- 10Y*
- 15.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SHAPX vs. LCLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHAPX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than LCLAX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SHAPX vs. LCLAX — Risk / Return Rank
SHAPX
LCLAX
SHAPX vs. LCLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX) and ClearBridge Select Fund Class A (LCLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHAPX | LCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 0.23 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 0.48 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.06 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 0.19 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.11 | 0.62 | +3.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHAPX | LCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 0.23 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.07 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.70 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.58 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between SHAPX and LCLAX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SHAPX vs. LCLAX - Dividend Comparison
SHAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.01%, while LCLAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHAPX ClearBridge Appreciation Fund | 15.01% | 14.08% | 9.00% | 4.17% | 8.85% | 6.54% | 4.13% | 7.09% | 6.71% | 5.10% | 3.29% | 4.76% |
LCLAX ClearBridge Select Fund Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 3.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.31% | 2.15% | 1.13% | 5.31% |
Drawdowns
SHAPX vs. LCLAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHAPX drawdown since its inception was -46.19%, which is greater than LCLAX's maximum drawdown of -43.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHAPX and LCLAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHAPX | LCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.19% | -43.64% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.57% | -14.36% | +3.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.53% | -43.64% | +23.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.21% | -43.64% | +11.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.74% | -14.36% | +5.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -10.17% | +5.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 4.39% | -2.10% |
Volatility
SHAPX vs. LCLAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX) is 3.74%, while ClearBridge Select Fund Class A (LCLAX) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that SHAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SHAPX | LCLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 5.55% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.86% | 11.39% | -3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 20.32% | -4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 21.83% | -6.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 21.90% | -5.20% |