SHAPX vs. VUG
SHAPX (ClearBridge Appreciation Fund) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both funds - SHAPX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, SHAPX returned 13.25%/yr vs 18.28%/yr for VUG. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SHAPX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
SHAPX vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHAPX achieves a 5.24% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 5.76% return. Over the past 10 years, SHAPX has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 13.25%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.28% annualized return.
SHAPX
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 5.24%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- 1Y
- 16.80%
- 3Y*
- 16.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
VUG
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- 5.76%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- 24.00%
- 3Y*
- 23.62%
- 5Y*
- 13.40%
- 10Y*
- 18.28%
SHAPX vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHAPX ClearBridge Appreciation Fund | 5.24% | 14.32% | 22.37% | 19.50% | -12.56% | 23.52% | 14.53% | 29.84% | -2.19% | 18.31% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 5.76% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHAPX and VUG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SHAPX and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHAPX vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
SHAPX
VUG
SHAPX vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHAPX | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.25 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 1.46 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | 4.99 | +3.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHAPX vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHAPX drawdown since its inception was -46.19%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHAPX and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHAPX | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.19% | -50.68% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | -16.53% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.15% | -22.85% | +6.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.53% | -35.61% | +15.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.21% | -35.61% | +3.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -4.86% | +3.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -7.09% | +2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 4.82% | -2.87% |
Volatility
SHAPX vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX) is 3.77%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that SHAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHAPX | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 6.55% | -2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.56% | 13.32% | -4.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.89% | 16.80% | -5.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 22.36% | -7.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 21.53% | -4.77% |
SHAPX vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHAPX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHAPX vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
SHAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.38%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHAPX ClearBridge Appreciation Fund | 13.38% | 14.08% | 9.00% | 4.17% | 8.85% | 6.54% | 4.13% | 7.09% | 6.71% | 5.10% | 3.29% | 4.76% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHAPX and VUG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VUG has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to SHAPX (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHAPX dropped -46.19% vs VUG's -50.68%.
SHAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHAPX and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer