PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHAG vs. ISTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHAG vs. ISTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF (SHAG) and iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHAG achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than ISTB's 0.57% return.


SHAG

1D
0.07%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.81%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*

ISTB

1D
0.08%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.92%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
2.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHAG vs. ISTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHAG
WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF
0.48%6.27%4.30%4.61%-6.37%-0.91%4.70%5.79%0.80%-0.11%
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
0.57%6.36%4.37%5.56%-6.08%-0.71%4.75%5.61%1.02%-0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SHAG and ISTB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017

0.78

The correlation between SHAG and ISTB shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHAG vs. ISTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHAG
SHAG Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SHAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHAG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SHAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHAG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ISTB
ISTB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ISTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISTB Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ISTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISTB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHAG vs. ISTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF (SHAG) and iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHAGISTBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.45

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

3.24

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.70

12.35

-2.65

SHAG vs. ISTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHAG Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the ISTB Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHAG and ISTB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHAGISTBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.31

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.67

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.84

0.00

Drawdowns

SHAG vs. ISTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHAG drawdown since its inception was -9.62%, roughly equal to the maximum ISTB drawdown of -9.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHAG and ISTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHAGISTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-9.34%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.38%

-1.26%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.38%

-1.36%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.62%

-9.34%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.34%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-1.22%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

0.33%

+0.06%

Volatility

SHAG vs. ISTB - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF (SHAG) has a higher volatility of 0.60% compared to iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) at 0.54%. This indicates that SHAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHAGISTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

0.54%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.31%

1.28%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

1.77%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.75%

2.79%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.58%

2.50%

+0.08%

SHAG vs. ISTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHAG has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than ISTB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SHAG vs. ISTB - Dividend Comparison

SHAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, which matches ISTB's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
4.25%4.12%3.83%2.97%2.01%1.69%2.20%2.75%2.57%2.06%1.90%1.58%
SHAG
WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF
4.28%4.33%4.49%3.04%1.38%0.92%2.33%2.71%2.56%0.77%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SHAG and ISTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SHAG has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to ISTB (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHAG dropped -9.62% vs ISTB's -9.34%.

On 5-year performance, ISTB leads with 1.87% vs 1.61% for SHAG. On fees, ISTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ISTB has performed better with a 1.87% return vs 1.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SHAG.

SHAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 4.25% for ISTB.

SHAG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Short Aggregate Enhanced Yield Index, while ISTB tracks BBG US Universal 1-5 Year Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SHAG and 0.06% for ISTB.

ISTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHAG and ISTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer