PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHAG vs. FTGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHAG vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF (SHAG) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHAG achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than FTGC's 26.15% return.


SHAG

1D
0.07%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.81%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*

FTGC

1D
-0.79%
1M
-3.25%
YTD
26.15%
6M
24.84%
1Y
40.32%
3Y*
17.80%
5Y*
12.90%
10Y*
7.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHAG vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHAG
WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF
0.48%6.27%4.30%4.61%-6.37%-0.91%4.70%5.79%0.80%-0.11%
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
26.15%14.61%9.96%-5.36%17.36%27.95%2.17%6.40%-12.75%4.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SHAG and FTGC is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017

-0.03

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SHAG and FTGC has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.25, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHAG vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHAG
SHAG Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SHAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHAG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SHAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHAG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FTGC
FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHAG vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF (SHAG) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHAGFTGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.45

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

5.12

-2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.70

16.79

-7.10

SHAG vs. FTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHAG Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the FTGC Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHAG and FTGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHAGFTGCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.59

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.81

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.23

+0.60

Drawdowns

SHAG vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHAG drawdown since its inception was -9.62%, smaller than the maximum FTGC drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHAG and FTGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHAGFTGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-59.47%

+49.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.38%

-7.91%

+6.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.38%

-10.39%

+9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.62%

-22.64%

+13.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-5.40%

+4.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-27.42%

+25.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

2.41%

-2.02%

Volatility

SHAG vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF (SHAG) is 0.60%, while First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that SHAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHAGFTGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

4.55%

-3.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.31%

13.17%

-11.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

15.62%

-13.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.75%

15.98%

-13.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.58%

14.71%

-12.13%

SHAG vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHAG has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHAG vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison

SHAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than FTGC's 15.20% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
15.20%17.74%3.05%3.34%10.35%7.21%0.00%0.81%0.80%1.21%
SHAG
WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF
4.28%4.33%4.49%3.04%1.38%0.92%2.33%2.71%2.56%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHAG and FTGC have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTGC has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to SHAG (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHAG dropped -9.62% vs FTGC's -59.47%.

On 5-year performance, FTGC leads with 12.90% vs 1.61% for SHAG. On fees, SHAG is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SHAG has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTGC has performed better with a 12.90% return vs 1.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHAG is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.

FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 4.28% for SHAG.

SHAG is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while FTGC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SHAG and 0.95% for FTGC.

FTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHAG and FTGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer