SHAG vs. FFUT
SHAG (WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHAG is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Short Aggregate Enhanced Yield Index, while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. SHAG is passively managed, while FFUT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. SHAG charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.
Performance
SHAG vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHAG achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 12.38% return.
SHAG
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 1.61%
- 10Y*
- —
FFUT
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 12.38%
- 6M
- 13.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHAG vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SHAG WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.48% | 3.38% |
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 12.38% | 8.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHAG and FFUT is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHAG vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank
SHAG
FFUT
SHAG vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF (SHAG) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHAG | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.70 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHAG | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 1.96 | -1.13 |
Drawdowns
SHAG vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHAG drawdown since its inception was -9.62%, which is greater than FFUT's maximum drawdown of -2.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHAG and FFUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHAG | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.62% | -2.84% | -6.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -1.21% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -0.88% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.39% | — | — |
Volatility
SHAG vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHAG | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84% | 11.15% | -9.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.75% | 11.15% | -8.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.58% | 11.15% | -8.57% |
SHAG vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHAG has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHAG vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison
SHAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, more than FFUT's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 1.86% | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHAG WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.28% | 4.33% | 4.49% | 3.04% | 1.38% | 0.92% | 2.33% | 2.71% | 2.56% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHAG and FFUT have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SHAG is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SHAG is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.
SHAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 1.86% for FFUT.
SHAG is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SHAG and 0.80% for FFUT.
Find the right allocation for SHAG and FFUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer