SGWS.L vs. MINV.L
SGWS.L (iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and MINV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - SGWS.L tracks the MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index while MINV.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGWS.L returned 9.69%/yr vs 5.62%/yr for MINV.L. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGWS.L charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MINV.L.
Performance
SGWS.L vs. MINV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGWS.L is traded in GBP, while MINV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MINV.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGWS.L achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly higher than MINV.L's 2.64% return.
SGWS.L
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- YTD
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 19.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- —
MINV.L
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 4.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.14%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.58%
SGWS.L vs. MINV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGWS.L iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 10.87% | 12.73% | 13.86% | 24.27% | -20.28% | 28.51% | 7.96% |
MINV.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF | 2.64% | 3.37% | 12.86% | 1.50% | 1.23% | 15.98% | -2.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGWS.L and MINV.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SGWS.L and MINV.L has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGWS.L vs. MINV.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGWS.L
MINV.L
SGWS.L vs. MINV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (SGWS.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGWS.L | MINV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.09 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 0.68 | +1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | 1.70 | +6.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGWS.L vs. MINV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGWS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.65%, smaller than the maximum MINV.L drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGWS.L and MINV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGWS.L | MINV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.65% | -39.64% | +13.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.63% | -6.31% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.92% | -20.10% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.65% | -20.10% | -5.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -2.04% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -8.62% | +2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 2.52% | -0.29% |
Volatility
SGWS.L vs. MINV.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (SGWS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) at 2.80%. This indicates that SGWS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGWS.L | MINV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 2.80% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 6.23% | +4.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.40% | 8.14% | +5.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 16.99% | -1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.20% | 15.18% | +0.02% |
SGWS.L vs. MINV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGWS.L has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than MINV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGWS.L vs. MINV.L - Dividend Comparison
SGWS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, while MINV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINV.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGWS.L iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 1.17% | 1.16% | 1.36% | 1.47% | 1.75% | 1.16% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGWS.L and MINV.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGWS.L is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGWS.L is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MINV.L.
SGWS.L tracks MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index, while MINV.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for SGWS.L and 0.35% for MINV.L.
Find the right allocation for SGWS.L and MINV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer