SGSU.L vs. CYGB.L
SGSU.L (iShares $ Corp Bond 0-3yr ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and CYGB.L (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - SGSU.L is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate 0-3 ESG SRI Index (USD), while CYGB.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGSU.L returned 2.53%/yr vs 5.42%/yr for CYGB.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGSU.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CYGB.L.
Performance
SGSU.L vs. CYGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGSU.L achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than CYGB.L's 3.44% return.
SGSU.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- 3.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 2.53%
- 10Y*
- —
CYGB.L
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.42%
- 10Y*
- —
SGSU.L vs. CYGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGSU.L iShares $ Corp Bond 0-3yr ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 1.47% | 5.12% | 5.16% | 4.29% | -2.66% | -0.63% |
CYGB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 3.44% | 2.20% | 11.38% | 7.14% | 2.11% | 2.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGSU.L and CYGB.L is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGSU.L vs. CYGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGSU.L
CYGB.L
SGSU.L vs. CYGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Corp Bond 0-3yr ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (SGSU.L) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CYGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGSU.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | 1.28 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.26 | 5.28 | +3.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.87 | 12.15 | +16.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGSU.L vs. CYGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGSU.L drawdown since its inception was -8.45%, which is greater than CYGB.L's maximum drawdown of -1.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGSU.L and CYGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGSU.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.45% | -1.56% | -6.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.42% | -0.69% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.62% | -1.56% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.83% | -1.56% | -3.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.17% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -0.24% | -0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.13% | 0.29% | -0.16% |
Volatility
SGSU.L vs. CYGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares $ Corp Bond 0-3yr ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (SGSU.L) is 0.48%, while iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CYGB.L) has a volatility of 0.59%. This indicates that SGSU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CYGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGSU.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.48% | 0.59% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.22% | 2.24% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73% | 2.72% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.14% | 2.38% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.02% | 2.33% | +0.69% |
SGSU.L vs. CYGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGSU.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than CYGB.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGSU.L vs. CYGB.L - Dividend Comparison
SGSU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than CYGB.L's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYGB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 1.70% | 1.84% | 2.13% | 2.38% | 2.68% | 2.21% | 0.00% |
SGSU.L iShares $ Corp Bond 0-3yr ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 4.47% | 4.60% | 4.62% | 3.98% | 1.67% | 0.79% | 3.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGSU.L and CYGB.L have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGSU.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGSU.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CYGB.L.
SGSU.L is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while CYGB.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. SGSU.L tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate 0-3 ESG SRI Index (USD), while CYGB.L tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for SGSU.L and 0.40% for CYGB.L.
Find the right allocation for SGSU.L and CYGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer