SGOV vs. CCLFX
SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) and CCLFX (Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund) are both funds - SGOV is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index, while CCLFX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Cliffwater. Over the past 5 years, SGOV returned 3.64%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for CCLFX. Their -0.04 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SGOV charges 0.09%/yr vs 3.42%/yr for CCLFX.
Performance
SGOV vs. CCLFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGOV achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than CCLFX's 3.18% return.
SGOV
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.64%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.96%
CCLFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 6.85%
- 3Y*
- 10.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $1.66B | $1.89B | $2.03B |
SGOV vs. CCLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 2.04% | 4.24% | 5.27% | 5.12% | 1.58% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 3.18% | 8.93% | 12.62% | 12.66% | 2.32% | 10.38% | 8.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGOV and CCLFX is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2020 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGOV vs. CCLFX — Risk / Return Rank
SGOV
CCLFX
SGOV vs. CCLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGOV | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +12.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +364.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 383.06 | 6.80 | +376.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 390.94 | 36.45 | +354.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6,193.70 | 200.20 | +5,993.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGOV vs. CCLFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGOV drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum CCLFX drawdown of -3.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOV and CCLFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGOV | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -3.91% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.01% | -0.19% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.01% | -0.46% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.03% | -2.25% | +2.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.16% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 0.03% | -0.03% |
Volatility
SGOV vs. CCLFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) is 0.05%, while Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) has a volatility of 0.20%. This indicates that SGOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGOV | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | 0.20% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.13% | 0.64% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19% | 0.85% | -0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.24% | 1.73% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.24% | 1.86% | -1.62% |
SGOV vs. CCLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGOV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CCLFX's 3.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGOV vs. CCLFX - Dividend Comparison
SGOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than CCLFX's 10.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 10.09% | 10.47% | 11.27% | 10.96% | 3.96% | 7.03% | 6.90% | 0.61% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.80% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGOV and CCLFX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCLFX has higher volatility (0.20%) compared to SGOV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOV dropped -0.03% vs CCLFX's -3.91%.
SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.72 vs 8.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGOV and CCLFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer