SGOV vs. CBOX
SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) and CBOX (Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGOV is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index, while CBOX is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Calamos. SGOV is passively managed, while CBOX is actively managed. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SGOV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for CBOX.
Performance
SGOV vs. CBOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SGOV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 4.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.96%
CBOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.89M | $8.89M | $7.14M | |
| $1.83B | $1.81B | $2.03B |
SGOV vs. CBOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 1.07% |
CBOX Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF | 1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGOV and CBOX is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2026 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGOV vs. CBOX — Risk / Return Rank
SGOV
CBOX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SGOV vs. CBOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) and Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF (CBOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGOV | CBOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 382.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 389.90 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6,177.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGOV vs. CBOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGOV drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum CBOX drawdown of -2.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOV and CBOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGOV | CBOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -2.90% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.30% | +2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -1.47% | +1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility
SGOV vs. CBOX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGOV | CBOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19% | 7.83% | -7.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.24% | 7.83% | -7.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.23% | 7.83% | -7.60% |
SGOV vs. CBOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGOV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CBOX's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SGOV vs. CBOX - Dividend Comparison
SGOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, while CBOX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBOX Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.79% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGOV and CBOX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for CBOX.
SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 0.00% for CBOX.
SGOV is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CBOX is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for SGOV and 0.14% for CBOX.
Find the right allocation for SGOV and CBOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer