PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGLS.L vs. WDEE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGLS.L vs. WDEE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L) and Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SGLS.L is traded in GBp, while WDEE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WDEE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGLS.L achieves a -7.33% return, which is significantly lower than WDEE.L's 24.76% return.


SGLS.L

1D
0.31%
1M
-10.74%
YTD
-7.33%
6M
-11.16%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
26.33%
5Y*
16.05%
10Y*

WDEE.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.14%
YTD
24.76%
6M
26.15%
1Y
34.71%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGLS.L vs. WDEE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SGLS.L
Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC
-7.33%63.32%25.10%2.27%
WDEE.L
Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc
24.76%1.24%5.84%5.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SGLS.L and WDEE.L is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2023

-0.02

The correlation between SGLS.L and WDEE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.00 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGLS.L vs. WDEE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGLS.L
SGLS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
SGLS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

WDEE.L
WDEE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
WDEE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDEE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGLS.L vs. WDEE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L) and Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGLS.LWDEE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.31

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

2.91

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

8.35

-6.07

SGLS.L vs. WDEE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGLS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the WDEE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGLS.L and WDEE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGLS.L vs. WDEE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGLS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, which is greater than WDEE.L's maximum drawdown of -21.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLS.L and WDEE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGLS.LWDEE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.66%

-21.91%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.66%

-11.86%

-12.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.66%

-21.91%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.42%

-9.63%

-14.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.81%

-7.28%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.52%

4.14%

+4.38%

Volatility

SGLS.L vs. WDEE.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to Invesco S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened UCITS ETF Acc (WDEE.L) at 6.80%. This indicates that SGLS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDEE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGLS.LWDEE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

6.80%

+2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.90%

16.51%

+6.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.82%

19.58%

+6.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

19.37%

-1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

19.37%

-1.96%

SGLS.L vs. WDEE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGLS.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than WDEE.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGLS.L vs. WDEE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGLS.L nor WDEE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SGLS.L and WDEE.L have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WDEE.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WDEE.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for SGLS.L.

SGLS.L is categorized as Gold, while WDEE.L is Energy Equities. SGLS.L tracks Gold (GBP Hedged), while WDEE.L tracks S&P World Energy Targeted & Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for SGLS.L and 0.18% for WDEE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGLS.L and WDEE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer