PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGLS.L vs. SGLD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGLS.L vs. SGLD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L) and Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SGLS.L is traded in GBp, while SGLD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SGLD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGLS.L achieves a -7.33% return, which is significantly lower than SGLD.L's -4.73% return.


SGLS.L

1D
0.31%
1M
-10.74%
YTD
-7.33%
6M
-11.16%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
26.33%
5Y*
16.05%
10Y*

SGLD.L

1D
0.15%
1M
-9.03%
YTD
-4.73%
6M
-8.41%
1Y
25.15%
3Y*
26.09%
5Y*
18.75%
10Y*
11.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGLS.L vs. SGLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SGLS.L
Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC
-7.33%63.32%25.10%11.48%-1.79%-5.15%3.51%
SGLD.L
Invesco Physical Gold ETC
-4.73%53.13%28.43%7.70%11.80%-3.17%-3.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SGLS.L and SGLD.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020

0.81

The correlation between SGLS.L and SGLD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGLS.L vs. SGLD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGLS.L
SGLS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
SGLS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SGLD.L
SGLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
SGLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGLS.L vs. SGLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L) and Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGLS.LSGLD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.20

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

1.08

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

3.08

-0.80

SGLS.L vs. SGLD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGLS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the SGLD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGLS.L and SGLD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGLS.L vs. SGLD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGLS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, smaller than the maximum SGLD.L drawdown of -41.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLS.L and SGLD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGLS.LSGLD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.66%

-41.62%

+16.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.66%

-23.08%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.66%

-23.08%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.66%

-23.08%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.42%

-22.88%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.81%

-13.52%

+4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.52%

8.14%

+0.38%

Volatility

SGLS.L vs. SGLD.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L) and Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L) have volatilities of 9.07% and 8.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGLS.LSGLD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

8.89%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.90%

22.44%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.82%

25.18%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

17.03%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

15.84%

+1.57%

SGLS.L vs. SGLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGLS.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLD.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGLS.L vs. SGLD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGLS.L nor SGLD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SGLS.L and SGLD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SGLD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGLD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for SGLS.L.

SGLS.L tracks Gold (GBP Hedged), while SGLD.L tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for SGLS.L and 0.12% for SGLD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGLS.L and SGLD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer