SGLS.L vs. GLDA.L
SGLS.L (Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC) and GLDA.L (Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)) are both Precious Metals funds - SGLS.L tracks the Gold (GBP Hedged) while GLDA.L tracks the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGLS.L returned 17.34%/yr vs 20.09%/yr for GLDA.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SGLS.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GLDA.L.
Performance
SGLS.L vs. GLDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGLS.L achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly lower than GLDA.L's 3.93% return.
SGLS.L
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- 3.01%
- 6M
- 5.20%
- 1Y
- 30.77%
- 3Y*
- 29.59%
- 5Y*
- 17.34%
- 10Y*
- —
GLDA.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- YTD
- 3.93%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- 1Y
- 33.65%
- 3Y*
- 28.01%
- 5Y*
- 20.09%
- 10Y*
- —
SGLS.L vs. GLDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLS.L Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC | 3.01% | 64.22% | 24.42% | 11.48% | -1.42% | -4.63% | -3.17% |
GLDA.L Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) | 3.93% | 53.56% | 28.19% | 7.26% | 12.68% | -3.12% | -8.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGLS.L and GLDA.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, SGLS.L and GLDA.L have become more correlated (0.93) than their long-term average of 0.64, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGLS.L vs. GLDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGLS.L
GLDA.L
SGLS.L vs. GLDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L) and Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGLS.L | GLDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.87 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 5.03 | -0.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGLS.L | GLDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.43 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 1.41 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 1.07 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
SGLS.L vs. GLDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGLS.L drawdown since its inception was -21.94%, roughly equal to the maximum GLDA.L drawdown of -21.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLS.L and GLDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGLS.L | GLDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.94% | -21.57% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.93% | -17.90% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.93% | -17.90% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.94% | -17.90% | -4.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.99% | -16.00% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.98% | -5.40% | -1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.84% | 6.67% | +0.17% |
Volatility
SGLS.L vs. GLDA.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.L) at 5.20%. This indicates that SGLS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGLS.L | GLDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 5.20% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.65% | 20.39% | +1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.68% | 23.46% | +1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 17.65% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 18.02% | +0.27% |
SGLS.L vs. GLDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGLS.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDA.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGLS.L vs. GLDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGLS.L nor GLDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SGLS.L and GLDA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GLDA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for SGLS.L.
SGLS.L tracks Gold (GBP Hedged), while GLDA.L tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for SGLS.L and 0.12% for GLDA.L.
Find the right allocation for SGLS.L and GLDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer