SGLN.L vs. TMUS
SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SGLN.L returned 13.01%/yr vs 17.26%/yr for TMUS. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SGLN.L vs. TMUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGLN.L is traded in GBp, while TMUS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TMUS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGLN.L achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly higher than TMUS's -5.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SGLN.L has underperformed TMUS with an annualized return of 13.01%, while TMUS has yielded a comparatively higher 17.26% annualized return.
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -1.83%
- 6M
- -1.90%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.65%
- 5Y*
- 18.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
TMUS
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- -5.43%
- 6M
- -2.35%
- 1Y
- -14.45%
- 3Y*
- 12.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 17.26%
SGLN.L vs. TMUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -1.83% | 53.66% | 28.20% | 7.24% | 11.84% | -2.82% | 19.93% | 14.63% | 4.36% | 1.68% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -5.43% | -13.23% | 42.14% | 9.27% | 35.06% | -13.18% | 66.91% | 18.59% | 6.10% | 0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGLN.L and TMUS is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | 0.03 |
The correlation between SGLN.L and TMUS shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.06 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGLN.L vs. TMUS — Risk / Return Rank
SGLN.L
TMUS
SGLN.L vs. TMUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGLN.L | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.92 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | -0.48 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.51 | -0.82 | +4.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGLN.L vs. TMUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -53.23%, smaller than the maximum TMUS drawdown of -82.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLN.L and TMUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGLN.L | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.23% | -82.61% | +29.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.87% | -30.20% | +7.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.87% | -37.22% | +14.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.87% | -37.22% | +14.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.87% | -37.22% | +14.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.64% | -32.85% | +12.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.70% | -24.61% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.37% | 17.69% | -10.32% |
Volatility
SGLN.L vs. TMUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) is 6.68%, while T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that SGLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGLN.L | TMUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 7.27% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.78% | 20.26% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.82% | 26.15% | -2.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.84% | 24.16% | -2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 26.79% | -7.95% |
Dividends
SGLN.L vs. TMUS - Dividend Comparison
SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.08% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGLN.L and TMUS have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SGLN.L and TMUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer