PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGLN.L vs. SMEA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGLN.L vs. SMEA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) and iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGLN.L achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than SMEA.L's 8.24% return. Over the past 10 years, SGLN.L has outperformed SMEA.L with an annualized return of 13.45%, while SMEA.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.90% annualized return.


SGLN.L

1D
3.00%
1M
-5.02%
YTD
1.11%
6M
0.92%
1Y
28.52%
3Y*
28.28%
5Y*
19.57%
10Y*
13.45%

SMEA.L

1D
0.27%
1M
4.14%
YTD
8.24%
6M
9.09%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
14.21%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
10.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGLN.L vs. SMEA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
1.11%53.66%28.20%7.24%11.84%-2.82%19.93%14.63%4.36%1.68%
SMEA.L
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
8.24%25.88%3.68%13.36%-3.48%16.94%2.44%19.59%-9.45%14.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SGLN.L and SMEA.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011

0.06

The correlation between SGLN.L and SMEA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (5 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGLN.L vs. SMEA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGLN.L
SGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

SMEA.L
SMEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SMEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SMEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGLN.L vs. SMEA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) and iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGLN.LSMEA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.99

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.82

7.11

-3.30

SGLN.L vs. SMEA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the SMEA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGLN.L and SMEA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGLN.L vs. SMEA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -53.23%, which is greater than SMEA.L's maximum drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLN.L and SMEA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGLN.LSMEA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.23%

-30.06%

-23.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.87%

-10.56%

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-14.06%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.87%

-15.76%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.87%

-28.56%

+5.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.26%

0.00%

-18.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.70%

-6.65%

-18.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.46%

2.96%

+4.50%

Volatility

SGLN.L vs. SMEA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SMEA.L) at 3.27%. This indicates that SGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMEA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGLN.LSMEA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.49%

3.27%

+4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.98%

10.27%

+10.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.00%

12.15%

+11.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.88%

18.17%

+3.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

17.03%

+1.82%

SGLN.L vs. SMEA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SGLN.L and SMEA.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SGLN.L vs. SMEA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGLN.L nor SMEA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SGLN.L and SMEA.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGLN.L and SMEA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

SGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while SMEA.L is Europe Equities. SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while SMEA.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGLN.L and SMEA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer