SGLN.L vs. GOLB.L
SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and GOLB.L (Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF) are both Gold funds - SGLN.L tracks the LBMA Gold Price while GOLB.L tracks the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGLN.L returned 18.77%/yr vs 20.48%/yr for GOLB.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SGLN.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GOLB.L.
Performance
SGLN.L vs. GOLB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGLN.L is traded in GBp, while GOLB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GOLB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGLN.L achieves a -4.94% return, which is significantly higher than GOLB.L's -6.12% return.
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -9.12%
- YTD
- -4.94%
- 6M
- -8.41%
- 1Y
- 24.63%
- 3Y*
- 26.05%
- 5Y*
- 18.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
GOLB.L
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -11.87%
- YTD
- -6.12%
- 6M
- -11.22%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 38.72%
- 5Y*
- 20.48%
- 10Y*
- —
SGLN.L vs. GOLB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -4.94% | 53.66% | 28.20% | 7.24% | 11.84% | -2.82% | 13.85% |
GOLB.L Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF | -6.12% | 138.44% | 14.06% | 0.34% | 1.34% | -14.65% | 84.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGLN.L and GOLB.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2020 | 0.66 |
The correlation between SGLN.L and GOLB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGLN.L vs. GOLB.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGLN.L
GOLB.L
SGLN.L vs. GOLB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (GOLB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGLN.L | GOLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.23 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.75 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.97 | 4.54 | -1.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGLN.L vs. GOLB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -53.23%, which is greater than GOLB.L's maximum drawdown of -44.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLN.L and GOLB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGLN.L | GOLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.23% | -44.07% | -9.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.20% | -33.95% | +10.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.20% | -33.95% | +10.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.20% | -37.60% | +14.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.15% | -32.23% | +9.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.69% | -21.25% | -3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.27% | 13.10% | -4.83% |
Volatility
SGLN.L vs. GOLB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) is 8.09%, while Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (GOLB.L) has a volatility of 16.93%. This indicates that SGLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOLB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGLN.L | GOLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.09% | 16.93% | -8.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.25% | 36.28% | -15.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.09% | 44.56% | -20.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 34.48% | -12.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 43.67% | -25.28% |
SGLN.L vs. GOLB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGLN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GOLB.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGLN.L vs. GOLB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGLN.L nor GOLB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGLN.L and GOLB.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GOLB.L.
SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while GOLB.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and China Post Global. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SGLN.L and 0.65% for GOLB.L.
Find the right allocation for SGLN.L and GOLB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer