SGLN.L vs. BRK-B
SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SGLN.L returned 11.26%/yr vs 12.73%/yr for BRK-B. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SGLN.L vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGLN.L is traded in GBp, while BRK-B is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-B values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGLN.L achieves a -6.69% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-B's -1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, SGLN.L has underperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 11.26%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively higher 12.73% annualized return.
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -4.78%
- 6M
- -14.07%
- YTD
- -6.69%
- 1Y
- 19.73%
- 3Y*
- 24.99%
- 5Y*
- 17.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.55%
BRK-B
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- 6M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.54%
SGLN.L vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -6.69% | 53.66% | 28.20% | 7.24% | 11.84% | -2.82% | 19.93% | 14.63% | 4.36% | 1.68% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -1.98% | 2.99% | 29.31% | 9.69% | 15.59% | 30.17% | -0.64% | 6.71% | 9.11% | 11.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGLN.L and BRK-B is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGLN.L vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
SGLN.L
BRK-B
SGLN.L vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGLN.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.05 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 0.30 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | 0.64 | +1.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGLN.L vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -53.23%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -37.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLN.L and BRK-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGLN.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.23% | -37.92% | -15.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.89% | -11.88% | -13.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.89% | -17.26% | -7.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.89% | -20.84% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.89% | -21.44% | -3.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.56% | -11.73% | -12.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.68% | -7.44% | -17.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.23% | 5.66% | +4.57% |
Volatility
SGLN.L vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 5.16%. This indicates that SGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGLN.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 5.16% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.20% | 12.51% | +8.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.53% | 16.06% | +8.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.01% | 16.95% | +5.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 19.76% | -1.42% |
Dividends
SGLN.L vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGLN.L nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGLN.L and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SGLN.L and BRK-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer