SGLC vs. EBI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SGLC (SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF) and EBI (Longview Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SGLC returned 33.91% vs 34.11% for EBI. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SGLC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for EBI.

Performance

SGLC vs. EBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SGLC having a 14.85% return and EBI slightly higher at 14.86%.

SGLC

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 5.34%
• YTD: 14.85%
• 6M: 16.84%
• 1Y: 33.91%
• 3Y*: 22.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EBI

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 3.43%
• YTD: 14.86%
• 6M: 15.24%
• 1Y: 34.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGLC vs. EBI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SGLC SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF	14.85%	17.84%
EBI Longview Advantage ETF	14.86%	15.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SGLC and EBI is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025	0.85

The correlation between SGLC and EBI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SGLC vs. EBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGLC

SGLC Risk / Return Rank: 77
SGLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
SGLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SGLC Omega Ratio Rank: 77
SGLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SGLC Martin Ratio Rank: 81

EBI

EBI Risk / Return Rank: 87
EBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
EBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
EBI Omega Ratio Rank: 85
EBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
EBI Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGLC vs. EBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SGLC	EBI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	2.83	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	3.87	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.50	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	4.83	-1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.67	19.92	-4.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SGLC vs. EBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the EBI Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGLC and EBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGLC	EBI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	2.83	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.44	1.42	+0.02

Drawdowns

SGLC vs. EBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGLC drawdown since its inception was -20.24%, which is greater than EBI's maximum drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLC and EBI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGLC	EBI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.24%	-17.05%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-7.09%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-0.24%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.45%	-2.06%	-0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	1.72%	+0.45%

Volatility

SGLC vs. EBI - Volatility Comparison

SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) has a higher volatility of 3.26% compared to Longview Advantage ETF (EBI) at 2.85%. This indicates that SGLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGLC	EBI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.26%	2.85%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.04%	8.80%	+2.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.49%	12.13%	+1.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.03%	17.93%	-1.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.03%	17.93%	-1.90%

SGLC vs. EBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGLC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than EBI's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGLC vs. EBI - Dividend Comparison

SGLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than EBI's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EBI Longview Advantage ETF	0.92%	1.05%	0.00%	0.00%
SGLC SGI U.S. Large Cap Core ETF	0.20%	0.23%	8.68%	1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGLC and EBI in my portfolio?

SGLC and EBI have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SGLC or EBI?

SGLC has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to EBI (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGLC dropped -20.24% vs EBI's -17.05%.

Which ETF is better, SGLC or EBI?

On 1-year performance, EBI leads with 34.11% vs 33.91% for SGLC. On fees, EBI is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, EBI has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SGLC or EBI?

Over the 1-year period, EBI has performed better with a 34.11% return vs 33.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SGLC or EBI?

EBI is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SGLC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SGLC or EBI?

EBI has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.20% for SGLC.

What is the main difference between SGLC and EBI?

They also come from different issuers: Summit Global Investments and Longview. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SGLC and 0.24% for EBI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.