PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGJP.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SGJP.L is traded in GBP, while IJPA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IJPA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGJP.L achieves a 17.03% return, which is significantly higher than IJPA.L's 16.15% return.


SGJP.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
4.16%
YTD
17.03%
6M
16.27%
1Y
35.44%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
10Y*

IJPA.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
6.14%
YTD
16.15%
6M
15.80%
1Y
33.76%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
10.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SGJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
17.03%16.65%8.33%13.55%-7.58%2.94%
IJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc
16.11%18.21%8.48%13.38%-6.19%1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SGJP.L and IJPA.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.93

The correlation between SGJP.L and IJPA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SGJP.L
IJPA.L

Industrials

25.2%
25.2%

Technology

20.8%
19.8%

Financial Services

19.0%
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
12.2%

Communication Services

8.6%
5.7%

Healthcare

6.8%
5.8%

Basic Materials

3.1%
5.1%

Real Estate

2.5%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
4.0%

Utilities

0.6%
1.2%

Energy

-

0.9%

Industrials

SGJP.L
25.2%
IJPA.L
25.2%

Technology

SGJP.L
20.8%
IJPA.L
19.8%

Financial Services

SGJP.L
19.0%
IJPA.L
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SGJP.L
11.0%
IJPA.L
12.2%

Communication Services

SGJP.L
8.6%
IJPA.L
5.7%

Healthcare

SGJP.L
6.8%
IJPA.L
5.8%

Basic Materials

SGJP.L
3.1%
IJPA.L
5.1%

Real Estate

SGJP.L
2.5%
IJPA.L
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

SGJP.L
2.4%
IJPA.L
4.0%

Utilities

SGJP.L
0.6%
IJPA.L
1.2%

Energy

SGJP.L

-

IJPA.L
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGJP.L
SGJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SGJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SGJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

IJPA.L
IJPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IJPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGJP.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGJP.LIJPA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.16

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.33

10.36

-0.03

SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the IJPA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGJP.L and IJPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGJP.LIJPA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.81

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.54

+0.09

Drawdowns

SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGJP.L drawdown since its inception was -18.79%, smaller than the maximum IJPA.L drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGJP.L and IJPA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGJP.LIJPA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.79%

-25.10%

+6.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-10.63%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

-13.21%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.05%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.13%

-6.35%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.25%

+0.06%

Volatility

SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGJP.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) have volatilities of 4.09% and 4.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGJP.LIJPA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

4.11%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.78%

15.54%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.42%

18.61%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

16.16%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

16.58%

-0.64%

SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGJP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IJPA.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGJP.L nor IJPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SGJP.L and IJPA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IJPA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SGJP.L.

SGJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IJPA.L tracks MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SGJP.L and 0.12% for IJPA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGJP.L and IJPA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer