SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L
SGJP.L (iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IJPA.L (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Japan Equities funds from iShares - SGJP.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY while IJPA.L tracks the MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SGJP.L returned 15.15%/yr vs 15.71%/yr for IJPA.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SGJP.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IJPA.L.
Performance
SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGJP.L is traded in GBP, while IJPA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IJPA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGJP.L achieves a 17.03% return, which is significantly higher than IJPA.L's 16.15% return.
SGJP.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 17.03%
- 6M
- 16.27%
- 1Y
- 35.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IJPA.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 6.14%
- YTD
- 16.15%
- 6M
- 15.80%
- 1Y
- 33.76%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGJP.L iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 17.03% | 16.65% | 8.33% | 13.55% | -7.58% | 2.94% |
IJPA.L iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc | 16.11% | 18.21% | 8.48% | 13.38% | -6.19% | 1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGJP.L and IJPA.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SGJP.L and IJPA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SGJP.L
IJPA.L
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
-
Industrials
SGJP.L
IJPA.L
Technology
SGJP.L
IJPA.L
Financial Services
SGJP.L
IJPA.L
Consumer Cyclical
SGJP.L
IJPA.L
Communication Services
SGJP.L
IJPA.L
Healthcare
SGJP.L
IJPA.L
Basic Materials
SGJP.L
IJPA.L
Real Estate
SGJP.L
IJPA.L
Consumer Defensive
SGJP.L
IJPA.L
Utilities
SGJP.L
IJPA.L
Energy
SGJP.L
-
IJPA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGJP.L
IJPA.L
SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGJP.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGJP.L | IJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 3.16 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.33 | 10.36 | -0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGJP.L | IJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 1.81 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.54 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGJP.L drawdown since its inception was -18.79%, smaller than the maximum IJPA.L drawdown of -25.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGJP.L and IJPA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGJP.L | IJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.79% | -25.10% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.77% | -10.63% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.67% | -13.21% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -0.05% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.13% | -6.35% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 3.25% | +0.06% |
Volatility
SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGJP.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) have volatilities of 4.09% and 4.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGJP.L | IJPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 4.11% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.78% | 15.54% | -0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.42% | 18.61% | -0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 16.16% | -0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 16.58% | -0.64% |
SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGJP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IJPA.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SGJP.L vs. IJPA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGJP.L nor IJPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SGJP.L and IJPA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IJPA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SGJP.L.
SGJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IJPA.L tracks MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SGJP.L and 0.12% for IJPA.L.
Find the right allocation for SGJP.L and IJPA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer