PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGJP.L vs. HPJS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGJP.L vs. HPJS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGJP.L) and HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGJP.L achieves a 17.03% return, which is significantly higher than HPJS.L's 8.46% return.


SGJP.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
4.16%
YTD
17.03%
6M
16.27%
1Y
35.44%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
10Y*

HPJS.L

1D
-1.17%
1M
0.61%
YTD
8.46%
6M
6.90%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
7.09%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGJP.L vs. HPJS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SGJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
17.03%16.65%8.33%13.55%-7.58%-3.10%
HPJS.L
HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF
8.46%14.99%-1.51%9.90%-15.00%-3.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SGJP.L and HPJS.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2021

0.93

The correlation between SGJP.L and HPJS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGJP.L vs. HPJS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGJP.L
SGJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SGJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SGJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

HPJS.L
HPJS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HPJS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPJS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPJS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
HPJS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPJS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGJP.L vs. HPJS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGJP.L) and HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGJP.LHPJS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.04

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.33

6.70

+3.64

SGJP.L vs. HPJS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the HPJS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGJP.L and HPJS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGJP.LHPJS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.35

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.15

+0.48

Drawdowns

SGJP.L vs. HPJS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGJP.L drawdown since its inception was -18.79%, smaller than the maximum HPJS.L drawdown of -24.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGJP.L and HPJS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGJP.LHPJS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.79%

-24.65%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-12.22%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

-17.24%

+2.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-1.70%

+1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.13%

-11.45%

+5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.72%

-0.41%

Volatility

SGJP.L vs. HPJS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGJP.L) is 4.09%, while HSBC MSCI Japan Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF (HPJS.L) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that SGJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HPJS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGJP.LHPJS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

4.72%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.78%

14.68%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.42%

18.43%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

15.94%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

15.94%

0.00%

SGJP.L vs. HPJS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGJP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HPJS.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SGJP.L vs. HPJS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGJP.L nor HPJS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SGJP.L and HPJS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SGJP.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SGJP.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for HPJS.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SGJP.L and 0.18% for HPJS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGJP.L and HPJS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer