PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGIL.L vs. SXRS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGIL.L vs. SXRS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGIL.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (SXRS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SGIL.L is traded in GBP, while SXRS.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SXRS.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGIL.L achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than SXRS.DE's 22.86% return.


SGIL.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.14%
6M
0.44%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
0.67%
5Y*
-1.24%
10Y*
1.78%

SXRS.DE

1D
-1.44%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
22.86%
6M
23.21%
1Y
38.85%
3Y*
12.70%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGIL.L vs. SXRS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SGIL.L
iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.14%1.15%-1.44%-0.60%-12.55%4.21%8.42%4.53%5.41%
SXRS.DE
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
22.86%10.17%6.12%-12.23%27.30%30.12%-8.48%4.01%-3.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SGIL.L and SXRS.DE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2018

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGIL.L vs. SXRS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGIL.L
SGIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SGIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SGIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

SXRS.DE
SXRS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SXRS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGIL.L vs. SXRS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGIL.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (SXRS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGIL.LSXRS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.38

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

5.01

-3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.06

11.53

-8.46

SGIL.L vs. SXRS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGIL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the SXRS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGIL.L and SXRS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGIL.LSXRS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

2.06

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.72

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.53

-0.12

Drawdowns

SGIL.L vs. SXRS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGIL.L drawdown since its inception was -20.23%, smaller than the maximum SXRS.DE drawdown of -28.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGIL.L and SXRS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGIL.LSXRS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.23%

-28.60%

+8.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.17%

-7.71%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.63%

-14.74%

+9.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.23%

-28.60%

+8.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.00%

-5.07%

-9.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-12.63%

+5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

3.36%

-1.74%

Volatility

SGIL.L vs. SXRS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGIL.L) is 1.13%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (SXRS.DE) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that SGIL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXRS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGIL.LSXRS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

5.63%

-4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.56%

16.67%

-13.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.03%

18.81%

-13.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.38%

16.86%

-8.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.97%

15.79%

-6.82%

SGIL.L vs. SXRS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGIL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SXRS.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SGIL.L vs. SXRS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGIL.L nor SXRS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SGIL.L and SXRS.DE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXRS.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRS.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SGIL.L.

SGIL.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while SXRS.DE is Commodities. SGIL.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR USD, while SXRS.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SGIL.L and 0.19% for SXRS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGIL.L and SXRS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer