SGIL.L vs. IITU.L
SGIL.L (iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SGIL.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR USD, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGIL.L returned 1.78%/yr vs 27.26%/yr for IITU.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGIL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.
Performance
SGIL.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGIL.L is traded in GBP, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGIL.L achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SGIL.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 1.78%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.26% annualized return.
SGIL.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 0.67%
- 5Y*
- -1.24%
- 10Y*
- 1.78%
IITU.L
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 23.25%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 53.38%
- 3Y*
- 30.94%
- 5Y*
- 25.50%
- 10Y*
- 27.26%
SGIL.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGIL.L iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.14% | 1.15% | -1.44% | -0.60% | -12.55% | 4.21% | 8.42% | 4.53% | 1.56% | -1.38% |
IITU.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 23.25% | 14.44% | 40.85% | 50.70% | -20.63% | 35.67% | 38.34% | 44.21% | 4.28% | 25.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGIL.L and IITU.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGIL.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGIL.L
IITU.L
SGIL.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGIL.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGIL.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.44 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 3.17 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.06 | 8.17 | -5.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGIL.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 2.71 | -1.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 1.16 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 1.28 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 1.23 | -0.82 |
Drawdowns
SGIL.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGIL.L drawdown since its inception was -20.23%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGIL.L and IITU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGIL.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.23% | -28.03% | +7.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | -16.76% | +13.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.63% | -28.03% | +22.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.23% | -28.03% | +7.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.23% | -28.03% | +7.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.00% | -2.89% | -12.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -5.14% | -1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 6.51% | -4.89% |
Volatility
SGIL.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGIL.L) is 1.13%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that SGIL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGIL.L | IITU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | 7.01% | -5.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.56% | 14.45% | -10.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.03% | 19.60% | -14.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.38% | 21.94% | -13.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.97% | 21.31% | -12.34% |
SGIL.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGIL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SGIL.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGIL.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGIL.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SGIL.L.
SGIL.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. SGIL.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR USD, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SGIL.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.
Find the right allocation for SGIL.L and IITU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer