SGIL.L vs. EUNZ.DE
SGIL.L (iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EUNZ.DE (iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGIL.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR USD, while EUNZ.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGIL.L returned 1.78%/yr vs 7.23%/yr for EUNZ.DE. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGIL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for EUNZ.DE.
Performance
SGIL.L vs. EUNZ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGIL.L is traded in GBP, while EUNZ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EUNZ.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGIL.L achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than EUNZ.DE's 17.76% return. Over the past 10 years, SGIL.L has underperformed EUNZ.DE with an annualized return of 1.78%, while EUNZ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.23% annualized return.
SGIL.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 0.67%
- 5Y*
- -1.24%
- 10Y*
- 1.78%
EUNZ.DE
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 17.76%
- 6M
- 17.22%
- 1Y
- 25.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- 7.23%
SGIL.L vs. EUNZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGIL.L iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.14% | 1.15% | -1.44% | -0.60% | -12.55% | 4.21% | 8.42% | 4.53% | 1.56% | -1.38% |
EUNZ.DE iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF | 17.76% | 5.04% | 10.69% | 1.78% | -3.86% | 5.08% | 3.01% | 4.83% | -0.51% | 16.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGIL.L and EUNZ.DE is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2013 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGIL.L vs. EUNZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SGIL.L
EUNZ.DE
SGIL.L vs. EUNZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGIL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGIL.L | EUNZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.42 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 3.22 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.06 | 10.90 | -7.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGIL.L | EUNZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 2.17 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 0.58 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.53 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.36 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
SGIL.L vs. EUNZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGIL.L drawdown since its inception was -20.23%, smaller than the maximum EUNZ.DE drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGIL.L and EUNZ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGIL.L | EUNZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.23% | -28.49% | +8.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | -8.01% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.63% | -11.91% | +6.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.23% | -11.91% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.23% | -22.56% | +2.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.00% | -1.76% | -13.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -6.00% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 2.37% | -0.75% |
Volatility
SGIL.L vs. EUNZ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGIL.L) is 1.13%, while iShares Edge MSCI EM Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (EUNZ.DE) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that SGIL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUNZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGIL.L | EUNZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | 4.71% | -3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.56% | 10.28% | -6.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.03% | 11.87% | -6.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.38% | 11.25% | -2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.97% | 13.56% | -4.59% |
SGIL.L vs. EUNZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGIL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGIL.L vs. EUNZ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGIL.L nor EUNZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGIL.L and EUNZ.DE have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGIL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGIL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EUNZ.DE.
SGIL.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while EUNZ.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. SGIL.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR USD, while EUNZ.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SGIL.L and 0.40% for EUNZ.DE.
Find the right allocation for SGIL.L and EUNZ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer