SGIL.L vs. EUNN.DE
SGIL.L (iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EUNN.DE (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGIL.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR USD, while EUNN.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan IMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGIL.L returned 1.78%/yr vs 10.11%/yr for EUNN.DE. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGIL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for EUNN.DE.
Performance
SGIL.L vs. EUNN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGIL.L is traded in GBP, while EUNN.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EUNN.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGIL.L achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than EUNN.DE's 15.62% return. Over the past 10 years, SGIL.L has underperformed EUNN.DE with an annualized return of 1.78%, while EUNN.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.11% annualized return.
SGIL.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 0.67%
- 5Y*
- -1.24%
- 10Y*
- 1.78%
EUNN.DE
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 15.62%
- 6M
- 15.70%
- 1Y
- 33.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.64%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.11%
SGIL.L vs. EUNN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGIL.L iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.14% | 1.15% | -1.44% | -0.60% | -12.55% | 4.21% | 8.42% | 4.53% | 1.56% | -1.38% |
EUNN.DE iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF | 15.62% | 19.36% | 7.98% | 12.86% | -6.63% | 1.54% | 9.97% | 15.88% | -9.06% | 15.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGIL.L and EUNN.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2009 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGIL.L vs. EUNN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SGIL.L
EUNN.DE
SGIL.L vs. EUNN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGIL.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGIL.L | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.37 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 3.20 | -1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.06 | 10.58 | -7.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGIL.L | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 1.90 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 0.64 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.63 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.52 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
SGIL.L vs. EUNN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGIL.L drawdown since its inception was -20.23%, smaller than the maximum EUNN.DE drawdown of -25.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGIL.L and EUNN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGIL.L | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.23% | -25.14% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | -10.48% | +7.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.63% | -13.94% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.23% | -19.09% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.23% | -25.14% | +4.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.00% | -0.15% | -14.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -6.83% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 3.18% | -1.56% |
Volatility
SGIL.L vs. EUNN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGIL.L) is 1.13%, while iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) has a volatility of 3.14%. This indicates that SGIL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUNN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGIL.L | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | 3.14% | -2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.56% | 14.44% | -10.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.03% | 17.70% | -12.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.38% | 15.45% | -7.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.97% | 15.95% | -6.98% |
SGIL.L vs. EUNN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGIL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNN.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SGIL.L vs. EUNN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGIL.L nor EUNN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGIL.L and EUNN.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SGIL.L.
SGIL.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while EUNN.DE is Japan Equities. SGIL.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR USD, while EUNN.DE tracks MSCI Japan IMI. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SGIL.L and 0.12% for EUNN.DE.
Find the right allocation for SGIL.L and EUNN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer