SGIL.L vs. DBZB.DE
SGIL.L (iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and DBZB.DE (Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - SGIL.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR USD, while DBZB.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the FTSE World Government Bond - Developed Markets (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGIL.L returned 1.78%/yr vs -0.03%/yr for DBZB.DE. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SGIL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DBZB.DE.
Performance
SGIL.L vs. DBZB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGIL.L is traded in GBP, while DBZB.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the DBZB.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGIL.L achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly higher than DBZB.DE's -1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SGIL.L has outperformed DBZB.DE with an annualized return of 1.78%, while DBZB.DE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.03% annualized return.
SGIL.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 0.67%
- 5Y*
- -1.24%
- 10Y*
- 1.78%
DBZB.DE
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- -1.49%
- 6M
- -2.11%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 0.91%
- 5Y*
- -2.40%
- 10Y*
- -0.03%
SGIL.L vs. DBZB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGIL.L iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.14% | 1.15% | -1.44% | -0.60% | -12.55% | 4.21% | 8.42% | 4.53% | 1.56% | -1.38% |
DBZB.DE Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged | -1.49% | 6.55% | -4.75% | 1.49% | -10.46% | -10.02% | 10.04% | -0.89% | 1.05% | 4.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGIL.L and DBZB.DE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2009 | 0.53 |
The correlation between SGIL.L and DBZB.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.61 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGIL.L vs. DBZB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SGIL.L
DBZB.DE
SGIL.L vs. DBZB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGIL.L) and Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGIL.L | DBZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.09 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 0.57 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.06 | 1.34 | +1.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGIL.L | DBZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.48 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | -0.33 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | -0.00 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.10 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
SGIL.L vs. DBZB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGIL.L drawdown since its inception was -20.23%, smaller than the maximum DBZB.DE drawdown of -25.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGIL.L and DBZB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGIL.L | DBZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.23% | -25.37% | +5.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | -4.67% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.63% | -5.93% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.23% | -18.83% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.23% | -25.37% | +5.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.00% | -20.39% | +5.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -9.72% | +2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 1.97% | -0.35% |
Volatility
SGIL.L vs. DBZB.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SGIL.L) is 1.13%, while Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE) has a volatility of 1.67%. This indicates that SGIL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBZB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGIL.L | DBZB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | 1.67% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.56% | 3.84% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.03% | 5.48% | -0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.38% | 7.21% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.97% | 8.55% | +0.42% |
SGIL.L vs. DBZB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGIL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DBZB.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SGIL.L vs. DBZB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGIL.L nor DBZB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGIL.L and DBZB.DE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGIL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGIL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DBZB.DE.
SGIL.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while DBZB.DE is Global Bonds. SGIL.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR USD, while DBZB.DE tracks FTSE World Government Bond - Developed Markets (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SGIL.L and 0.25% for DBZB.DE.
Find the right allocation for SGIL.L and DBZB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer