PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGFFX vs. VSNGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGFFX vs. VSNGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund (VSNGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGFFX achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than VSNGX's 6.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SGFFX has outperformed VSNGX with an annualized return of 16.18%, while VSNGX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.49% annualized return.


SGFFX

1D
0.09%
1M
4.73%
YTD
4.05%
6M
3.14%
1Y
13.93%
3Y*
20.54%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
16.18%

VSNGX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.20%
YTD
6.63%
6M
6.84%
1Y
13.87%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
11.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGFFX vs. VSNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGFFX
Sparrow Growth Fund
4.05%14.31%34.81%17.02%-23.36%-11.00%97.83%27.24%6.26%31.24%
VSNGX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund
6.63%6.09%18.60%16.15%-16.03%19.97%22.62%32.73%-8.20%21.35%

Correlation

The correlation between SGFFX and VSNGX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between SGFFX and VSNGX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGFFX vs. VSNGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGFFX
SGFFX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SGFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SGFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

VSNGX
VSNGX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VSNGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSNGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSNGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VSNGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSNGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGFFX vs. VSNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund (VSNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGFFXVSNGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

1.12

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

1.70

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

1.71

-0.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.30

6.38

-3.08

SGFFX vs. VSNGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGFFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the VSNGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGFFX and VSNGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGFFXVSNGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.12

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.39

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.59

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.53

-0.25

Drawdowns

SGFFX vs. VSNGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGFFX drawdown since its inception was -62.10%, which is greater than VSNGX's maximum drawdown of -54.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGFFX and VSNGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGFFXVSNGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.10%

-54.50%

-7.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.33%

-8.24%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.29%

-18.96%

-20.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.24%

-25.08%

-15.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.45%

-38.33%

-12.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.48%

-0.04%

-15.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.17%

-7.43%

-14.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

2.20%

+2.38%

Volatility

SGFFX vs. VSNGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX) is 2.52%, while JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund (VSNGX) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that SGFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSNGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGFFXVSNGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

2.80%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

9.16%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.95%

12.40%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.12%

17.40%

+9.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.98%

19.59%

+8.39%

SGFFX vs. VSNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGFFX has a 1.81% expense ratio, which is higher than VSNGX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGFFX vs. VSNGX - Dividend Comparison

SGFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VSNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGFFX
Sparrow Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%18.67%0.00%0.67%1.33%5.84%7.33%0.00%2.59%
VSNGX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund
5.77%6.15%8.60%0.50%2.81%7.63%11.65%8.60%12.95%5.79%3.37%5.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGFFX and VSNGX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSNGX has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to SGFFX (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGFFX dropped -62.10% vs VSNGX's -54.50%.

SGFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGFFX and VSNGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer