SGFFX vs. FAMVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX) and FAM Value Fund (FAMVX).
SGFFX is managed by Sparrow. It was launched on Oct 2, 1998. FAMVX is managed by FAM. It was launched on Jan 2, 1987.
Performance
SGFFX vs. FAMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SGFFX vs. FAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGFFX Sparrow Growth Fund | -10.82% | 14.31% | 34.81% | 17.02% | -23.36% | -11.00% | 97.83% | 27.24% | 6.26% | 31.24% |
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | -1.31% | 4.90% | 15.51% | 16.09% | -14.06% | 25.65% | 6.81% | 30.31% | -6.15% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGFFX achieves a -10.82% return, which is significantly lower than FAMVX's -1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SGFFX has outperformed FAMVX with an annualized return of 14.43%, while FAMVX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.72% annualized return.
SGFFX
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- -10.82%
- 6M
- -10.77%
- 1Y
- 6.81%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- 2.14%
- 10Y*
- 14.43%
FAMVX
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -6.90%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SGFFX vs. FAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGFFX has a 1.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FAMVX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SGFFX vs. FAMVX — Risk / Return Rank
SGFFX
FAMVX
SGFFX vs. FAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX) and FAM Value Fund (FAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGFFX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 0.26 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.72 | 0.51 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.07 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 0.47 | +0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | 1.65 | +0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGFFX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 0.26 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.38 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.54 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.58 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between SGFFX and FAMVX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SGFFX vs. FAMVX - Dividend Comparison
SGFFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGFFX Sparrow Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.67% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 1.33% | 5.84% | 7.33% | 0.00% | 2.59% |
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | 4.97% | 4.90% | 6.28% | 5.01% | 3.67% | 4.99% | 3.69% | 6.80% | 4.09% | 5.06% | 5.21% | 9.06% |
Drawdowns
SGFFX vs. FAMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGFFX drawdown since its inception was -62.10%, which is greater than FAMVX's maximum drawdown of -51.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGFFX and FAMVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGFFX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.10% | -51.12% | -10.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.33% | -11.38% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.24% | -22.77% | -17.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.45% | -37.73% | -12.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.56% | -7.14% | -20.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.19% | -6.45% | -15.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.36% | 3.25% | +1.11% |
Volatility
SGFFX vs. FAMVX - Volatility Comparison
Sparrow Growth Fund (SGFFX) and FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) have volatilities of 5.62% and 5.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SGFFX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 5.52% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 10.21% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.09% | 17.91% | +1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.72% | 17.08% | +10.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.97% | 18.15% | +9.82% |