PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGEA.L vs. TREI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGEA.L vs. TREI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SGEA.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SGEA.L is traded in GBP, while TREI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TREI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGEA.L achieves a -6.30% return, which is significantly lower than TREI.L's 2.42% return.


SGEA.L

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.75%
6M
-5.74%
YTD
-6.30%
1Y
-7.02%
3Y*
-0.14%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
0.95%

TREI.L

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.38%
6M
2.09%
YTD
2.42%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGEA.L vs. TREI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SGEA.L
iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-6.30%-1.01%3.19%-0.97%3.25%-3.19%2.88%
TREI.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF
2.42%-3.12%7.01%-0.27%12.48%0.92%-3.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SGEA.L and TREI.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

0.56

The correlation between SGEA.L and TREI.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGEA.L vs. TREI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGEA.L
SGEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SGEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SGEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

TREI.L
TREI.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TREI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TREI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TREI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TREI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TREI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGEA.L vs. TREI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SGEA.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGEA.LTREI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.11

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

0.83

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.29

2.27

-3.56

SGEA.L vs. TREI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGEA.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the TREI.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGEA.L and TREI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGEA.L vs. TREI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGEA.L drawdown since its inception was -40.80%, which is greater than TREI.L's maximum drawdown of -19.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGEA.L and TREI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGEA.LTREI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.80%

-19.00%

-21.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-5.11%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.30%

-9.81%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.30%

-15.98%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.01%

-5.65%

-4.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-10.06%

-7.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

1.87%

+3.04%

Volatility

SGEA.L vs. TREI.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SGEA.L) has a higher volatility of 1.89% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L) at 1.74%. This indicates that SGEA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TREI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGEA.LTREI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

1.74%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.38%

5.04%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.18%

6.59%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.98%

8.41%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.03%

8.77%

-0.74%

SGEA.L vs. TREI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGEA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TREI.L's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGEA.L vs. TREI.L - Dividend Comparison

SGEA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than TREI.L's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGEA.L
iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.60%3.40%3.00%2.90%2.81%2.37%2.97%2.55%2.46%2.17%2.65%1.11%
TREI.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF
3.92%4.23%4.98%4.59%1.51%0.10%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGEA.L and TREI.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TREI.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TREI.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGEA.L.

SGEA.L tracks iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while TREI.L tracks Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGEA.L and 0.06% for TREI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGEA.L and TREI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer