SGEA.L vs. SGLN.L
SGEA.L (iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and SGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - SGEA.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while SGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGEA.L returned 0.95%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for SGLN.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGEA.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLN.L.
Performance
SGEA.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SGEA.L is traded in GBP, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SGEA.L having a -6.30% return and SGLN.L slightly lower at -6.40%. Over the past 10 years, SGEA.L has underperformed SGLN.L with an annualized return of 0.95%, while SGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.
SGEA.L
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- -6.30%
- 1Y
- -7.02%
- 3Y*
- -0.14%
- 5Y*
- 0.02%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
SGLN.L
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- -7.43%
- 6M
- -12.76%
- YTD
- -6.40%
- 1Y
- 20.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
SGEA.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGEA.L iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -6.30% | -1.01% | 3.19% | -0.97% | 3.25% | -3.19% | 5.39% | 5.58% | 3.87% | 2.31% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -6.40% | 53.66% | 28.20% | 7.24% | 11.84% | -2.82% | 19.93% | 14.63% | 4.36% | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGEA.L and SGLN.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2012 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SGEA.L and SGLN.L has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGEA.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGEA.L
SGLN.L
SGEA.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SGEA.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGEA.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.17 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 0.84 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 2.08 | -3.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGEA.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGEA.L drawdown since its inception was -40.80%, smaller than the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -53.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGEA.L and SGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGEA.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.80% | -53.23% | +12.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -24.33% | +15.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.30% | -24.33% | +14.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.30% | -24.33% | +14.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.02% | -24.33% | +12.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.01% | -24.33% | +14.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.31% | -24.68% | +7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 9.87% | -4.96% |
Volatility
SGEA.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SGEA.L) is 1.89%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that SGEA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGEA.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.89% | 6.72% | -4.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.38% | 21.25% | -16.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.18% | 24.49% | -18.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.98% | 22.01% | -15.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.03% | 18.34% | -10.31% |
SGEA.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGEA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGEA.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
SGEA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, while SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGEA.L iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.60% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.90% | 2.81% | 2.37% | 2.97% | 2.55% | 2.46% | 2.17% | 2.65% | 1.11% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGEA.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGEA.L.
SGEA.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while SGLN.L is Gold. SGEA.L tracks iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGEA.L and 0.12% for SGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for SGEA.L and SGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer