PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFYX vs. NUMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SFYX vs. NUMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SFYX vs. NUMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SFYX
SoFi Next 500 ETF
5.66%14.25%14.45%17.70%-22.88%18.89%17.63%6.95%
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
-13.96%0.78%11.99%20.47%-28.31%12.27%45.73%9.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFYX achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly higher than NUMG's -13.96% return.


SFYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.66%
6M
7.51%
1Y
28.83%
3Y*
13.77%
5Y*
6.70%
10Y*

NUMG

1D
3.29%
1M
-6.68%
YTD
-13.96%
6M
-15.60%
1Y
-4.28%
3Y*
2.51%
5Y*
-1.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SFYX vs. NUMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFYX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NUMG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SFYX vs. NUMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFYX
SFYX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

NUMG
NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFYX vs. NUMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFYXNUMGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

-0.18

+1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

-0.10

+1.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.99

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

-0.21

+1.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.98

-0.65

+5.64

SFYX vs. NUMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the NUMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFYX and NUMG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFYXNUMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

-0.18

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

-0.08

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.37

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between SFYX and NUMG is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SFYX vs. NUMG - Dividend Comparison

SFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than NUMG's 0.01% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFYX
SoFi Next 500 ETF
1.36%1.44%1.25%1.51%1.56%0.90%1.16%1.02%0.00%0.00%
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.01%0.01%0.06%0.18%0.18%12.76%3.82%0.27%5.14%0.56%

Drawdowns

SFYX vs. NUMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFYX drawdown since its inception was -39.59%, roughly equal to the maximum NUMG drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYX and NUMG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SFYXNUMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.59%

-38.85%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.97%

-19.71%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.36%

-38.85%

+6.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-21.68%

+20.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.36%

-11.30%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.24%

6.47%

-2.23%

Volatility

SFYX vs. NUMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX) is 4.79%, while Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that SFYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SFYXNUMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

6.83%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

14.15%

-3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.72%

23.42%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.42%

22.83%

-1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.37%

21.92%

+1.45%