SFNNX vs. FELAX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SFNNX (Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund) and FELAX (Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - SFNNX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Charles Schwab, while FELAX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, SFNNX returned 11.86%/yr vs 36.38%/yr for FELAX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SFNNX charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for FELAX.

Performance

SFNNX vs. FELAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFNNX achieves a 21.09% return, which is significantly lower than FELAX's 73.68% return. Over the past 10 years, SFNNX has underperformed FELAX with an annualized return of 11.86%, while FELAX has yielded a comparatively higher 36.38% annualized return.

SFNNX

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 6.32%
• YTD: 21.09%
• 6M: 25.51%
• 1Y: 43.99%
• 3Y*: 24.21%
• 5Y*: 13.37%
• 10Y*: 11.86%

FELAX

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: 18.59%
• YTD: 73.68%
• 6M: 74.82%
• 1Y: 160.71%
• 3Y*: 60.16%
• 5Y*: 41.41%
• 10Y*: 36.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFNNX vs. FELAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SFNNX Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund	21.09%	41.06%	2.27%	19.88%	-7.95%	14.38%	4.35%	18.09%	-13.96%	23.95%
FELAX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A	73.68%	44.88%	43.74%	75.08%	-35.07%	57.50%	43.57%	63.76%	-12.76%	34.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SFNNX and FELAX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008	0.63

The correlation between SFNNX and FELAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SFNNX vs. FELAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFNNX

SFNNX Risk / Return Rank: 87
SFNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SFNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
SFNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
SFNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SFNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

FELAX

FELAX Risk / Return Rank: 97
FELAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FELAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FELAX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FELAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FELAX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFNNX vs. FELAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SFNNX	FELAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.19	5.19	-2.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.09	5.09	-1.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.69	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.31	10.81	-6.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.20	42.15	-25.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SFNNX vs. FELAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFNNX Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is lower than the FELAX Sharpe Ratio of 5.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFNNX and FELAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SFNNX	FELAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.19	5.19	-2.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	1.09	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	1.05	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.46	-0.18

Drawdowns

SFNNX vs. FELAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFNNX drawdown since its inception was -59.60%, smaller than the maximum FELAX drawdown of -71.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFNNX and FELAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFNNX	FELAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.60%	-71.33%	+11.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.63%	-14.66%	+4.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.78%	-36.43%	+22.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.66%	-46.15%	+20.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.23%	-46.15%	+5.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.97%	-21.88%	+9.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	3.76%	-0.94%

Volatility

SFNNX vs. FELAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) is 4.69%, while Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX) has a volatility of 10.64%. This indicates that SFNNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SFNNX	FELAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	10.64%	-5.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.58%	24.65%	-13.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.39%	32.03%	-17.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.56%	38.24%	-22.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.29%	34.63%	-17.34%

SFNNX vs. FELAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFNNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FELAX's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFNNX vs. FELAX - Dividend Comparison

SFNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than FELAX's 4.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FELAX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A	4.01%	6.96%	7.02%	3.40%	3.32%	4.34%	4.51%	1.00%	20.15%	9.67%	0.36%	10.71%
SFNNX Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund	4.22%	5.11%	3.61%	3.26%	2.92%	3.81%	2.42%	3.69%	3.51%	2.70%	3.21%	2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFNNX and FELAX in my portfolio?

SFNNX and FELAX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SFNNX or FELAX?

FELAX has higher volatility (10.64%) compared to SFNNX (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFNNX dropped -59.60% vs FELAX's -71.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FELAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 3.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.