PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFNNX vs. DFEQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFNNX vs. DFEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) and DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFNNX achieves a 21.09% return, which is significantly higher than DFEQX's 1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SFNNX has outperformed DFEQX with an annualized return of 11.86%, while DFEQX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.93% annualized return.


SFNNX

1D
0.96%
1M
6.32%
YTD
21.09%
6M
25.51%
1Y
43.99%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
13.37%
10Y*
11.86%

DFEQX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.31%
6M
1.63%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
4.83%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
1.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFNNX vs. DFEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFNNX
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund
21.09%41.06%2.27%19.88%-7.95%14.38%4.35%18.09%-13.96%23.95%
DFEQX
DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio
1.31%4.27%5.50%5.44%-5.18%-0.60%2.24%4.51%1.34%1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between SFNNX and DFEQX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.00

Over the past year, SFNNX and DFEQX have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.00, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFNNX vs. DFEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFNNX
SFNNX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SFNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SFNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

DFEQX
DFEQX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DFEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFNNX vs. DFEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) and DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFNNXDFEQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.19

3.53

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.09

5.61

-1.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

2.12

-0.54

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

5.09

-0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.20

21.45

-5.25

SFNNX vs. DFEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFNNX Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is comparable to the DFEQX Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFNNX and DFEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFNNXDFEQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

3.53

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.98

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

1.15

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

1.14

-0.86

Drawdowns

SFNNX vs. DFEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFNNX drawdown since its inception was -59.60%, which is greater than DFEQX's maximum drawdown of -8.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFNNX and DFEQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFNNXDFEQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.60%

-8.40%

-51.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.63%

-0.76%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.78%

-1.16%

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-8.40%

-17.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.23%

-8.40%

-31.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.10%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.97%

-0.95%

-11.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

0.18%

+2.64%

Volatility

SFNNX vs. DFEQX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio (DFEQX) at 0.45%. This indicates that SFNNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFNNXDFEQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

0.45%

+4.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

0.88%

+10.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.39%

1.07%

+13.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.56%

2.08%

+13.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

1.70%

+15.59%

SFNNX vs. DFEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFNNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DFEQX's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SFNNX vs. DFEQX - Dividend Comparison

SFNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than DFEQX's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFEQX
DFA Short-Term Extended Quality Portfolio
4.13%3.62%4.40%3.34%1.78%1.05%0.47%2.18%3.14%1.51%1.59%1.72%
SFNNX
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund
4.22%5.11%3.61%3.26%2.92%3.81%2.42%3.69%3.51%2.70%3.21%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFNNX and DFEQX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFNNX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to DFEQX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFNNX dropped -59.60% vs DFEQX's -8.40%.

DFEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 3.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFNNX and DFEQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer