PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFLR vs. PTLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFLR vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLR achieves a 5.95% return, which is significantly lower than PTLC's 6.32% return.


SFLR

1D
0.15%
1M
5.40%
YTD
5.95%
6M
6.48%
1Y
20.19%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
10Y*

PTLC

1D
0.19%
1M
5.37%
YTD
6.32%
6M
6.63%
1Y
23.09%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
11.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFLR vs. PTLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
5.95%13.29%19.99%21.20%1.38%
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
6.32%5.10%24.31%16.78%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SFLR and PTLC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022

0.86

The correlation between SFLR and PTLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

SFLR vs. PTLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SFLR
PTLC

Technology

35.5%
35.6%

Communication Services

11.7%
11.2%

Financial Services

11.3%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.5%

Industrials

8.4%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.9%

Energy

3.7%
3.5%

Utilities

2.5%
2.3%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.9%

Technology

SFLR
35.5%
PTLC
35.6%

Communication Services

SFLR
11.7%
PTLC
11.2%

Financial Services

SFLR
11.3%
PTLC
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SFLR
10.0%
PTLC
10.1%

Healthcare

SFLR
8.5%
PTLC
8.5%

Industrials

SFLR
8.4%
PTLC
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

SFLR
4.8%
PTLC
4.9%

Energy

SFLR
3.7%
PTLC
3.5%

Utilities

SFLR
2.5%
PTLC
2.3%

Basic Materials

SFLR
2.1%
PTLC
1.8%

Real Estate

SFLR
1.6%
PTLC
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFLR vs. PTLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLR
SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

PTLC
PTLC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PTLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PTLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLR vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFLRPTLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.28

2.06

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.08

2.74

+0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.37

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

2.69

+0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.47

10.69

+1.78

SFLR vs. PTLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLR Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the PTLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLR and PTLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFLRPTLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.06

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.73

0.71

+1.02

Drawdowns

SFLR vs. PTLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLR drawdown since its inception was -12.13%, smaller than the maximum PTLC drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLR and PTLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFLRPTLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.13%

-26.63%

+14.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.79%

-8.77%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.13%

-15.17%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-5.65%

+3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

2.21%

-0.55%

Volatility

SFLR vs. PTLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) is 1.79%, while Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that SFLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFLRPTLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

2.77%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.45%

8.13%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.89%

11.25%

-2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.15%

11.73%

-1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.15%

13.17%

-3.02%

SFLR vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PTLC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFLR vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison

SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than PTLC's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
1.00%1.06%0.67%1.18%1.26%0.73%1.08%1.10%1.00%0.97%1.08%0.42%
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
0.32%0.33%0.42%1.16%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SFLR and PTLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PTLC has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to SFLR (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLR dropped -12.13% vs PTLC's -26.63%.

On 3-year performance, SFLR leads with 16.16% vs 15.22% for PTLC. On fees, PTLC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SFLR has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SFLR has performed better with a 16.16% return vs 15.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTLC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.

PTLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.32% for SFLR.

SFLR is categorized as Options Trading, while PTLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SFLR and 0.60% for PTLC.

SFLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFLR and PTLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer