SFLR vs. PTLC
SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) and PTLC (Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFLR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while PTLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. SFLR is actively managed, while PTLC is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SFLR returned 16.16%/yr vs 15.22%/yr for PTLC. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTLC.
Performance
SFLR vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFLR achieves a 5.95% return, which is significantly lower than PTLC's 6.32% return.
SFLR
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTLC
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 6.32%
- 6M
- 6.63%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
SFLR vs. PTLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 5.95% | 13.29% | 19.99% | 21.20% | 1.38% |
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 6.32% | 5.10% | 24.31% | 16.78% | 0.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFLR and PTLC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022 | 0.86 |
The correlation between SFLR and PTLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
SFLR vs. PTLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFLR
PTLC
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
SFLR
PTLC
Communication Services
SFLR
PTLC
Financial Services
SFLR
PTLC
Consumer Cyclical
SFLR
PTLC
Healthcare
SFLR
PTLC
Industrials
SFLR
PTLC
Consumer Defensive
SFLR
PTLC
Energy
SFLR
PTLC
Utilities
SFLR
PTLC
Basic Materials
SFLR
PTLC
Real Estate
SFLR
PTLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFLR vs. PTLC — Risk / Return Rank
SFLR
PTLC
SFLR vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFLR | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.28 | 2.06 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.08 | 2.74 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.37 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 2.69 | +0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.47 | 10.69 | +1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFLR | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.06 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.73 | 0.71 | +1.02 |
Drawdowns
SFLR vs. PTLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFLR drawdown since its inception was -12.13%, smaller than the maximum PTLC drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLR and PTLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFLR | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.13% | -26.63% | +14.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.79% | -8.77% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.13% | -15.17% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.75% | -5.65% | +3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 2.21% | -0.55% |
Volatility
SFLR vs. PTLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) is 1.79%, while Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that SFLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFLR | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 2.77% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.45% | 8.13% | -1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.89% | 11.25% | -2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 11.73% | -1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 13.17% | -3.02% |
SFLR vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PTLC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFLR vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison
SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than PTLC's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.06% | 0.67% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 0.73% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 1.00% | 0.97% | 1.08% | 0.42% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 0.32% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 1.16% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, SFLR and PTLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PTLC has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to SFLR (1.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLR dropped -12.13% vs PTLC's -26.63%.
On 3-year performance, SFLR leads with 16.16% vs 15.22% for PTLC. On fees, PTLC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SFLR has been the lower-risk option at 1.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SFLR has performed better with a 16.16% return vs 15.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTLC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.
PTLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.32% for SFLR.
SFLR is categorized as Options Trading, while PTLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SFLR and 0.60% for PTLC.
SFLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFLR and PTLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer