SFLR vs. OCTQ
SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) and OCTQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. SFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for OCTQ.
Performance
SFLR vs. OCTQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SFLR
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 19.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCTQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFLR vs. OCTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 5.01% |
OCTQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October | 0.00% |
SFLR vs. OCTQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFLR
OCTQ
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
SFLR
OCTQ
Communication Services
SFLR
OCTQ
Financial Services
SFLR
OCTQ
Consumer Cyclical
SFLR
OCTQ
Healthcare
SFLR
OCTQ
Industrials
SFLR
OCTQ
Consumer Defensive
SFLR
OCTQ
Energy
SFLR
OCTQ
Utilities
SFLR
OCTQ
Basic Materials
SFLR
OCTQ
Real Estate
SFLR
OCTQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFLR vs. OCTQ — Risk / Return Rank
SFLR
OCTQ
SFLR vs. OCTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFLR | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.73 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFLR | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.71 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SFLR vs. OCTQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFLR drawdown since its inception was -12.13%, which is greater than OCTQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLR and OCTQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFLR | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.13% | 0.00% | -12.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | 0.00% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.74% | 0.00% | -1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | — | — |
Volatility
SFLR vs. OCTQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFLR | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.89% | 0.00% | +8.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 0.00% | +10.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 0.00% | +10.15% |
SFLR vs. OCTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFLR vs. OCTQ - Dividend Comparison
SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while OCTQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCTQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 0.32% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 1.16% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, OCTQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OCTQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.
SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for OCTQ.
Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SFLR and 0.79% for OCTQ.
Find the right allocation for SFLR and OCTQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer