SFLR vs. HOCT
SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) and HOCT (Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. SFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for HOCT.
Performance
SFLR vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SFLR
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 19.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFLR vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 5.01% |
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFLR vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank
SFLR
HOCT
SFLR vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFLR | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.20 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.73 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFLR | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.71 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SFLR vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFLR drawdown since its inception was -12.13%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLR and HOCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFLR | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.13% | 0.00% | -12.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | 0.00% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.74% | 0.00% | -1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | — | — |
Volatility
SFLR vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFLR | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.89% | 0.00% | +8.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 0.00% | +10.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 0.00% | +10.15% |
SFLR vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than HOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFLR vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison
SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while HOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 0.32% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 1.16% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.
SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for HOCT.
Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SFLR and 0.79% for HOCT.
Find the right allocation for SFLR and HOCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer