PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFLR vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SFLR vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SFLR vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
-3.85%13.29%19.99%21.20%1.38%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
-0.90%11.02%12.05%16.51%2.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLR achieves a -3.85% return, which is significantly lower than BUFF's -0.90% return.


SFLR

1D
1.67%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
-3.85%
6M
-1.57%
1Y
13.21%
3Y*
14.18%
5Y*
10Y*

BUFF

1D
1.46%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
1.13%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
11.21%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SFLR vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SFLR and BUFF have an expense ratio of 0.89%.


Return for Risk

SFLR vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLR
SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLR vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFLRBUFFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

1.23

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

1.84

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

1.72

+0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.91

9.71

-1.80

SFLR vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLR Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLR and BUFF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFLRBUFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.23

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.47

0.46

+1.01

Correlation

The correlation between SFLR and BUFF is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SFLR vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while BUFF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
0.35%0.33%0.42%1.16%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%

Drawdowns

SFLR vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLR drawdown since its inception was -12.13%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLR and BUFF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SFLRBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.13%

-46.23%

+34.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.79%

-7.15%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.24%

-2.18%

-3.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-6.29%

+4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.27%

+0.44%

Volatility

SFLR vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 2.61%. This indicates that SFLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SFLRBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

2.61%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.42%

4.05%

+3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.83%

9.82%

+1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.30%

8.40%

+1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.30%

17.83%

-7.53%