SFIG vs. FBDC
SFIG (WisdomTree U.S. Short Term Corporate Bond Fund) and FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the WisdomTree Fundamental U.S. Short-term Corporate Bond Index, while FBDC is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. SFIG is passively managed, while FBDC is actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SFIG charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for FBDC.
Performance
SFIG vs. FBDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFIG achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly higher than FBDC's -9.51% return.
SFIG
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.31%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.45%
FBDC
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- YTD
- -9.51%
- 6M
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFIG vs. FBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SFIG WisdomTree U.S. Short Term Corporate Bond Fund | 0.53% | 2.72% |
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | -9.51% | -2.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFIG and FBDC is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFIG vs. FBDC — Risk / Return Rank
SFIG
FBDC
SFIG vs. FBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Short Term Corporate Bond Fund (SFIG) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFIG | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.28 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.54 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFIG | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | -0.70 | +1.41 |
Drawdowns
SFIG vs. FBDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFIG drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, smaller than the maximum FBDC drawdown of -20.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFIG and FBDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFIG | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.35% | -20.60% | +8.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -17.24% | +16.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -10.14% | +8.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.35% | — | — |
Volatility
SFIG vs. FBDC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFIG | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.40% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94% | 18.06% | -16.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.00% | 18.06% | -15.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.42% | 18.06% | -14.64% |
SFIG vs. FBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FBDC's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFIG vs. FBDC - Dividend Comparison
SFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than FBDC's 11.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | 11.52% | 5.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFIG WisdomTree U.S. Short Term Corporate Bond Fund | 4.44% | 4.46% | 4.37% | 3.26% | 2.13% | 1.66% | 2.29% | 2.41% | 2.27% | 1.81% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFIG and FBDC have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SFIG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SFIG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.
FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.52%, compared with 4.44% for SFIG.
SFIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FBDC is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SFIG and 1.35% for FBDC.
Find the right allocation for SFIG and FBDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer