SFENX vs. FTBFX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SFENX (Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund) and FTBFX (Fidelity Total Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - SFENX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Charles Schwab, while FTBFX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, SFENX returned 11.08%/yr vs 2.43%/yr for FTBFX. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. SFENX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FTBFX.

Performance

SFENX vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund (SFENX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFENX achieves a 12.70% return, which is significantly higher than FTBFX's 0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, SFENX has outperformed FTBFX with an annualized return of 11.08%, while FTBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.43% annualized return.

SFENX

• 1D: 2.08%
• 1M: -1.54%
• YTD: 12.70%
• 6M: 14.20%
• 1Y: 29.05%
• 3Y*: 19.67%
• 5Y*: 9.04%
• 10Y*: 11.08%

FTBFX

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.57%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 4.86%
• 3Y*: 4.80%
• 5Y*: 0.60%
• 10Y*: 2.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFENX vs. FTBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SFENX Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund	12.70%	29.19%	12.31%	14.90%	-15.50%	13.91%	-3.01%	19.46%	-9.96%	26.44%
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund	0.57%	7.50%	2.13%	7.25%	-13.58%	-0.44%	9.34%	9.89%	-0.66%	4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SFENX and FTBFX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009	-0.03

The correlation between SFENX and FTBFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SFENX vs. FTBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFENX

SFENX Risk / Return Rank: 77
SFENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
SFENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
SFENX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
SFENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
SFENX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FTBFX

FTBFX Risk / Return Rank: 34
FTBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FTBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FTBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FTBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FTBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFENX vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund (SFENX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SFENX	FTBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.36	+0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	2.05	+0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.24	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	1.80	+1.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.95	5.30	+5.65

SFENX vs. FTBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFENX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the FTBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFENX and FTBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SFENX vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFENX drawdown since its inception was -47.19%, which is greater than FTBFX's maximum drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFENX and FTBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFENX	FTBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.19%	-18.25%	-28.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.45%	-2.89%	-6.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.51%	-5.82%	-10.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.26%	-18.25%	-11.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.59%	-18.25%	-21.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.91%	-1.31%	-2.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.87%	-2.32%	-10.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	0.98%	+1.69%

Volatility

SFENX vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund (SFENX) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) at 1.43%. This indicates that SFENX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SFENX	FTBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.58%	1.43%	+4.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.46%	2.85%	+8.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.85%	3.84%	+10.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.50%	5.67%	+9.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.91%	4.73%	+12.18%

SFENX vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFENX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FTBFX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFENX vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison

SFENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than FTBFX's 4.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund	4.36%	4.36%	4.15%	4.15%	2.54%	1.89%	5.22%	3.03%	3.19%	2.97%	3.61%	3.30%
SFENX Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund	3.49%	3.93%	4.67%	5.00%	5.46%	4.61%	2.95%	3.82%	2.90%	2.37%	2.16%	3.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFENX and FTBFX in my portfolio?

SFENX and FTBFX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SFENX or FTBFX?

SFENX has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to FTBFX (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFENX dropped -47.19% vs FTBFX's -18.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SFENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.