SETM vs. PBOG
SETM (Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF) and PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SETM is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Select Index - AUD - Benchmark TR Gross, while PBOG is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. SETM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBOG.
Performance
SETM vs. PBOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SETM achieves a 27.22% return, which is significantly lower than PBOG's 32.22% return.
SETM
- 1D
- -4.09%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 27.22%
- 6M
- 33.66%
- 1Y
- 144.21%
- 3Y*
- 30.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBOG
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 32.22%
- 6M
- 29.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SETM vs. PBOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | 27.22% | 11.38% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 32.22% | 1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SETM and PBOG is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SETM vs. PBOG — Risk / Return Rank
SETM
PBOG
SETM vs. PBOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SETM | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.25 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.29 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.61 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.42 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SETM | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 3.31 | -2.72 |
Drawdowns
SETM vs. PBOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SETM drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than PBOG's maximum drawdown of -11.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETM and PBOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SETM | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -11.45% | -31.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.30% | -6.81% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.26% | -3.10% | -11.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.31% | — | — |
Volatility
SETM vs. PBOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SETM | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.58% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.49% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.71% | 23.67% | +21.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.57% | 23.67% | +12.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.57% | 23.67% | +12.90% |
SETM vs. PBOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SETM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOG's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
SETM vs. PBOG - Dividend Comparison
SETM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than PBOG's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | 1.23% | 1.56% | 2.07% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SETM and PBOG have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SETM.
SETM has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.13% for PBOG.
SETM is categorized as Energy Equities, while PBOG is Oil & Gas. SETM tracks Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Select Index - AUD - Benchmark TR Gross, while PBOG tracks BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Portfolio Building Blocks. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SETM and 0.13% for PBOG.
Find the right allocation for SETM and PBOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer