SETM vs. DVXE
SETM (Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF) and DVXE (WEBs Energy XLE Defined Volatility ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - SETM tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Select Index - AUD - Benchmark TR Gross while DVXE tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLE Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. SETM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for DVXE.
Performance
SETM vs. DVXE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SETM achieves a 32.64% return, which is significantly lower than DVXE's 42.81% return.
SETM
- 1D
- 3.36%
- 1M
- 3.81%
- YTD
- 32.64%
- 6M
- 40.31%
- 1Y
- 158.67%
- 3Y*
- 32.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DVXE
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- 42.81%
- 6M
- 41.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SETM vs. DVXE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | 32.64% | 44.50% |
DVXE WEBs Energy XLE Defined Volatility ETF | 42.81% | 4.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SETM and DVXE is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SETM vs. DVXE — Risk / Return Rank
SETM
DVXE
SETM vs. DVXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) and WEBs Energy XLE Defined Volatility ETF (DVXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SETM | DVXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.59 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.51 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.22 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SETM | DVXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 1.91 | -1.27 |
Drawdowns
SETM vs. DVXE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SETM drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than DVXE's maximum drawdown of -17.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETM and DVXE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SETM | DVXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -17.96% | -24.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.35% | -13.30% | +9.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.27% | -5.77% | -8.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.30% | — | — |
Volatility
SETM vs. DVXE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SETM | DVXE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.49% | 31.27% | +13.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.52% | 31.27% | +5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.52% | 31.27% | +5.25% |
SETM vs. DVXE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SETM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DVXE's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
SETM vs. DVXE - Dividend Comparison
SETM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while DVXE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXE WEBs Energy XLE Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SETM Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF | 1.18% | 1.56% | 2.07% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SETM and DVXE have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SETM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SETM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXE.
SETM has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.00% for DVXE.
SETM tracks Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Select Index - AUD - Benchmark TR Gross, while DVXE tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLE Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and WEBs. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SETM and 0.89% for DVXE.
Find the right allocation for SETM and DVXE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer